TexasHouston

Richard A. Anderson (state of Texas Veterans Land

14041 Cottingham Road, Houston, TX 77048 · Harris County · 120 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 2019

Part of chain: TEXVET (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,730
Fines, last 3 years
5.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 23, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jul 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 23, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jun 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390E
202431K ▲
202520E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,730.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 23, 2024Fine$14,730

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.013.463.95top 4% in Texas; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.440.69top 10% in Texas; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.453.043.50top 4% in Texas; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.340.48top 16% in Texas; top 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.355.345.8top 9% in Texas; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)18.854.642.9top 6% in Texas; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.55, weekend 3.62. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Government - State

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Berkely, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Fellbaum, ErnestIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Havens, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Johanns, KathyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Studer, StanleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Stumberg, EricIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Stumberg, LouisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/08/2019
Touchstone Veterans Management LTD.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Terra Bella Health and Wellness Suites2.7 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Tuscany Village3.8 miPearland, TX★★★★☆4/5
The Colonnades at Reflection Bay4.1 miPearland, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Thrive Rehabilitation of Pearland4.3 miPearland, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Oasis at Pearland5.0 miPearland, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avir at Courtyard5.7 miHouston, TX★★★★☆5/5
Avir at Golfcrest5.7 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Orem5.7 miHouston, TX★★★★☆4/5
Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.3 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Harmony Care at Golfcrest6.4 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Holly Hall6.6 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of Houston6.7 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Houston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676479.