UtahOrem

Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

575 East 1400 South, Orem, UT 84097 · Utah County · 120 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Sep 4, 1986

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 18, 2023 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jul 18, 2023 · F-0610

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 22, 2024 · F-0603 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.

Why it matters: Forced isolation is emotionally harmful and can hide neglect or abuse from view.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 18, 2023 · F-0835

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 18, 2023 · F-0867

The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.

Why it matters: Without a working quality program, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 29, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
May 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep complete, dated laboratory records in residents' files.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jul 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jul 18, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Jul 18, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Feb 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230D
2023144K ▲
202421G ▲
2025100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.613.873.95top 49% in Utah; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.921.170.69bottom 39% in Utah; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.133.393.50top 50% in Utah; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.880.48bottom 32% in Utah; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.050.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.040.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.88, weekend 2.99. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Albrechtsen, JoshuaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Albrechtsen, JoshuaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Albrechtsen, JoshuaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Anderson, AaronIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2021
Anderson, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2021
Anderson, AaronIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2021
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2008
Hueneme Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Hueneme Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2025
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Moss, TylerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Orem Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley0.7 miOrem, UT★★★★★5/5
Provo Rehabilitation and Nursing1.8 miProvo, UT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Stonehenge of Orem2.4 miOrem, UT★★★★★5/5
Cascades at Orchard Park2.8 miOrem, UT★★★★☆4/5
Mission at Alpine Rehabilitation Center6.7 miPleasant Grove, UT★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Stonehenge of Springville7.8 miSpringville, UT★★★★★4/5
Stonehenge of American Fork8.8 miAmerican Fork, UT★★★★☆4/5
Monument Healthcare American Fork9.6 miAmerican Fork, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing11.3 miSpanish Fork, UT★★★☆☆4/5
Mervyn Sharp Bennion Central Utah Veterans Home15.2 miPayson, UT★★★★★5/5
Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation15.5 miLehi, UT★★★★★4/5
Rocky Mountain Care - Maple Dell15.8 miPayson, UT★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Orem →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465104.