UtahPrice

Pinnacle Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1340 East 300 North, Price, UT 84501 · Carbon County · 100 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1984

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.38
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. · from a complaint
Feb 24, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220E
202370D
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.383.873.95bottom 32% in Utah; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.251.170.69top 30% in Utah; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.393.50bottom 23% in Utah; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.870.880.48top 43% in Utah; top 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.350.745.8top 20% in Utah; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.640.642.9top 29% in Utah; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.54, RN 1.31, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Eaton, SpencerIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Eaton, SpencerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Eaton, SpencerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Moss, TylerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Potter, SterlingIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Potter, SterlingIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Potter, SterlingIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2014
Price Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Price Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Price Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Parkdale Health and Rehab1.6 miPrice, UT★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Price →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465098.