Utah ›Orem

Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1992 South Columbia Lane, Orem, UT 84097 (opens Google Maps) · Salt Lake County · (801) 724-6500· 24 certified beds · avg 21 residents/day · certified since Oct 7, 2009 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified

Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: ADVANCED HEALTH CARE (26 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 19, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 8, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583
Feb 8, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jul 7, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886
Jul 7, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202270E
202440E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.31
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 2.18
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.19
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.313.873.95top 12% in Utah; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.181.170.69top 4% in Utah; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.193.393.50top 13% in Utah; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.580.880.48top 7% in Utah; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.550.745.8top 35% in Utah; bottom 49% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.040.642.9top 14% in Utah; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.53, RN 2.69, weekend 5.15.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.53 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
New Ahc Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2023
The Bryan Miller Utah Dynasty Trust Dated April 22, 2014OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
The G&H Miller Utah Trust Dated February 26, 2019OrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
The Gail Miller GST TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest72%01/01/2024
Bartholomew, ChaseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2025
LHMSH LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Nattress, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2023
Nattress, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2025
New Ahc Holdings, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2025
Oxnam, NathanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Advanced Health Care — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
  • "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
  • "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
  • "What is your current policy for testing residents and staff when someone shows symptoms or there's an outbreak?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 46% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 13 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center0.7 miOrem, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Provo Rehabilitation and Nursing1.1 miProvo, UT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Stonehenge of Orem3.0 miOrem, UT★★★★★5/5
Cascades at Orchard Park3.5 miOrem, UT★★★★☆4/5
Stonehenge of Springville7.1 miSpringville, UT★★★★★4/5
Mission at Alpine Rehabilitation Center7.3 miPleasant Grove, UT★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Stonehenge of American Fork9.3 miAmerican Fork, UT★★★★☆4/5
Monument Healthcare American Fork10.2 miAmerican Fork, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing10.6 miSpanish Fork, UT★★★☆☆4/5
Mervyn Sharp Bennion Central Utah Veterans Home14.5 miPayson, UT★★★★★5/5
Rocky Mountain Care - Maple Dell15.1 miPayson, UT★★☆☆☆1/5
Advanced Health Care of Salem15.8 miSalem, UT★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Salt Lake, UT — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Orem →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465170.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details