740 North 300 East, Orem, UT 84057 (opens Google Maps) · Utah County · (801) 224-0921· 52 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CASCADES HEALTHCARE (19 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 19, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 16, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint F-0607
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $11,992.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2023 | Fine | $11,992 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.28 | 3.87 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Utah; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.69 | top 39% in Utah; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.00 | 3.39 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Utah; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.48 | top 41% in Utah; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 73.8 | 50.7 | 45.8 | bottom 7% in Utah; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.5 | 40.6 | 42.9 | bottom 40% in Utah; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 1.18, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.30 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cascades at Orchard Park. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baird, Gregory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Baird, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Barney, Janett | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| Beaver Valley Hospital | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/1999 |
| Brown, Gary | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| Cascades Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Cascades Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2025 |
| Langford, Scott | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| Langford, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Langford, Scott | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Martin, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Martin, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| McSpadden, Darin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| McSpadden, Darin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| McSpadden, Darin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2016 |
| Oakden, Richard | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| Robinson, Matthew | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| Smith, Val | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| White, Craig | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cascades Healthcare — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stonehenge of Orem | 1.4 mi | Orem, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.8 mi | Orem, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley | 3.5 mi | Orem, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Mission at Alpine Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | Pleasant Grove, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Provo Rehabilitation and Nursing | 4.6 mi | Provo, UT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Stonehenge of American Fork | 6.5 mi | American Fork, UT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare American Fork | 7.3 mi | American Fork, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stonehenge of Springville | 10.6 mi | Springville, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation | 13.3 mi | Lehi, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing | 14.1 mi | Spanish Fork, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Draper Rehabilitation and Care Center | 17.1 mi | Draper, UT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mervyn Sharp Bennion Central Utah Veterans Home | 17.8 mi | Payson, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Utah, UT — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465090.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details