Utah ›Springville

Stonehenge of Springville

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

909 West 450 South, Springville, UT 84663 (opens Google Maps) · Utah County · (801) 489-1900· 50 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Sep 11, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: STONEHENGE OF UTAH (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 5, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Mar 5, 2025
$4,938
Fines, last 3 years
3.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 5, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Apr 4, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656

View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742
Mar 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Aug 5, 2021F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801
Aug 5, 2021E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Aug 5, 2021E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Aug 5, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Aug 5, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Aug 5, 2021D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160F
202571G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $4,938.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 18, 2023Fine$1,764
Aug 28, 2023Fine$3,174

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.54
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.26
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.19
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.543.873.95bottom 48% in Utah; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.261.170.69top 29% in Utah; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.193.393.50top 41% in Utah; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.050.880.48top 20% in Utah; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.750.745.8bottom 43% in Utah; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)55.040.642.9bottom 27% in Utah; bottom 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.64, RN 1.29, weekend 3.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.64 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Stonehenge of Springville. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Carrera, RoryIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2022
Cichos, TysonIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2017
Cloward, WyattIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2017
Gillespie, DeborahIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Howells, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Loveless, KurtIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Pittard, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2023
Carrera, RoryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2022
Carrera, RoryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2022
Cichos, TysonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2017
Cichos, TysonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2017
Cloward, WyattIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2017
Cloward, WyattIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2017
Gillespie, DeborahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Gillespie, DeborahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Howells, StephenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/20/1992
Howells, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Howells, StephenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021
Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/25/2021

Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Stonehenge of Utah — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
  • "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
  • "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Spanish Fork Rehabilitation and Nursing3.5 miSpanish Fork, UT★★★☆☆4/5
Provo Rehabilitation and Nursing6.0 miProvo, UT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Aspen Ridge of Utah Valley7.1 miOrem, UT★★★★★5/5
Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center7.8 miOrem, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Mervyn Sharp Bennion Central Utah Veterans Home8.5 miPayson, UT★★★★★5/5
Rocky Mountain Care - Maple Dell8.7 miPayson, UT★★☆☆☆1/5
Advanced Health Care of Salem8.9 miSalem, UT★★★★★5/5
Stonehenge of Orem9.9 miOrem, UT★★★★★5/5
Cascades at Orchard Park10.6 miOrem, UT★★★★☆4/5
Mission at Alpine Rehabilitation Center14.4 miPleasant Grove, UT★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Stonehenge of American Fork16.1 miAmerican Fork, UT★★★★☆4/5
Monument Healthcare American Fork17.0 miAmerican Fork, UT★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Utah, UT — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Springville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465130.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details