How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nashville Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LL
832 Wedgewood Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203 (opens Google Maps) · Davidson County · (615) 806-8800· 142 certified beds · avg 137 residents/day · certified since May 21, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 16, 2023
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. F-0637
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Mar 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide at least one adequately sized room for dining and activities, with good lighting, airflow, and furniture. · F-0920 |
| Apr 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 24, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 11, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 12).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 15
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2019
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 15 | 0 | F |
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTennessee averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.13
Tennessee average: 3.62
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.52
Tennessee average: 0.57
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.49
Tennessee average: 3.15
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.13 | 3.62 | 3.95 | bottom 25% in Tennessee; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.69 | top 48% in Tennessee; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.49 | 3.15 | 3.50 | bottom 11% in Tennessee; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Tennessee; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 72.8 | 48.9 | 45.8 | bottom 2% in Tennessee; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 68.8 | 43.2 | 42.9 | bottom 13% in Tennessee; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.07, RN 0.68, weekend 3.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Nashville Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LL. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nashville Ventures TN LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/2017 |
| Yzh LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 07/09/2025 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Friedman, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| MD Friedman Family 2017 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2025 |
| Neal Einhorn Family 2017 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2025 |
| Peden, Roger | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2018 |
| Peden, Roger | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2018 |
| Turner, Demarcus | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2025 |
| Turner, Demarcus | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2025 |
| Williams, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Williams, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Yzh LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Quality Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC — Lebanon, TN · overall 1/5
- Trevecca Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC — Nashville, TN · overall 3/5
- Coral Reef Subacute Care Center LLC — Miami, FL · overall 3/5
- Encore at Boca Raton Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce — Boca Raton, FL · overall 3/5
- Legacy at Boca Raton Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce — Boca Raton, FL · overall 4/5
- Palmetto Subacute Care Center — Miami, FL · overall 5/5
- Pearl at Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation and Nursin — Fort Lauderdale, FL · overall 3/5
- Savoy at Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation and Nursin — Fort Lauderdale, FL · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Tennessee midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 73% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 30 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevecca Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC | 1.9 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Health Center at Richland Place | 2.0 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Nashville | 2.1 mi | Nashville, TN | —/5 | ||
| Green Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 3.0 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodcrest at Blakeford | 3.4 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Eaton Creek Post Acute | 6.6 mi | Nashville, TN | —/5 | SFF | |
| West Meade Place | 6.8 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bethany Center for Rehabilitation and Healing LLC | 6.8 mi | Nashville, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heartland | 7.2 mi | Nashville, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Whites Creek Wellness and Rehabilitation Center | 7.5 mi | Whites Creek, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Somerfield at the Heritage | 9.0 mi | Brentwood, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Antioch TN Opco, LLC | 9.5 mi | Antioch, TN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Davidson, TN — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- NHC Place at the Trace — Nashville, TN · overall 5/5
- Stoneridge Health Care, LLC — Goodlettsville, TN · overall 2/5
- The McKendree Post Acute & Rehabilitation — Hermitage, TN · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- The Meadows — Nashville, TN · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445512.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).