TexasMission

Mission Valley Nursing and Transitional Care

1200 S Bryan Rd, Mission, TX 78572 · Hidalgo County · 120 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Jul 11, 2018 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$38,990
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 23, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 25, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 25, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 11, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 29, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202410D
202573J ▲
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $38,990.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 29, 2025Fine$17,345
Aug 25, 2025Fine$21,645

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.133.463.95bottom 32% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.440.69top 47% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.773.043.50bottom 36% in Texas; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.340.48top 41% in Texas; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)18.355.345.8top 1% in Texas; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.054.642.9top 11% in Texas; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.44, weekend 3.06. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Mission Valley Nursing and Transitional Care LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest03/01/2021
Reg Bridge Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Val Verde County Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest03/01/2021
Baird, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Carvajal, AntonioIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2024
Chartrand, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/19/2014
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Diaz, CrisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/25/2022
Flores, IsabelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2018
Flores, IsabelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/05/2018
Garcia, MayraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center0.1 miMission, TX★★★★☆4/5
Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation3.5 miMcAllen, TX★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.5 miMcAllen, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of McAll4.9 miMcAllen, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Grand Terrace Rehabilitation and Healthcare5.2 miMcAllen, TX★★★★★5/5
Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home5.8 miMcAllen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
McAllen Nursing Center6.2 miMcAllen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
McAllen Transitional Care Center6.4 miMcAllen, TX★★★★☆3/5
Windsor Las Palmas Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent6.5 miMcAllen, TX★★★★★5/5
Colonial Manor Advanced Rehab & Healthcare8.3 miPharr, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Las Alturas de Penitas8.7 miPenitas, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.9 miEdinburg, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mission →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676446.