TexasMcAllen

McAllen Transitional Care Center

2109 South K Street, McAllen, TX 78503 · Hidalgo County · 100 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Jan 20, 2005

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,827
Fines, last 3 years
3.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 31, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 1, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 31, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
202441J ▲
202540D
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,827.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 31, 2024Fine$8,827

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.613.463.95top 29% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.440.69top 35% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.123.043.50top 33% in Texas; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.340.48top 43% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.155.345.8top 8% in Texas; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.054.642.9top 6% in Texas; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.46, weekend 3.21. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fannin County Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2023
Barrera, EdielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Barrera, EdielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Barrera, EdielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Klement Healthcare INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Klement Healthcare INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/24/2025
National Health Investors, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Pena, JoseIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Pena, JoseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Pena, JoseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Sanderson, ClarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023
Texas Nhi Investors, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Windsor Las Palmas Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent0.2 miMcAllen, TX★★★★★5/5
Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home0.7 miMcAllen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Grand Terrace Rehabilitation and Healthcare1.4 miMcAllen, TX★★★★★5/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of McAll1.7 miMcAllen, TX★★★☆☆4/5
McAllen Nursing Center1.8 miMcAllen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
San Juan Nursing Home, INC.3.5 miSan Juan, TX★★★★☆4/5
Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation3.7 miMcAllen, TX★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Colonial Manor Advanced Rehab & Healthcare4.3 miPharr, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.7 miMcAllen, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.3 miEdinburg, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
The Heights of Alamo5.4 miAlamo, TX★★★★★4/5
Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.8 miEdinburg, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in McAllen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676042.