New HampshireBerlin

Saint Vincent Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

29 Providence Avenue, Berlin, NH 03570 · Coos County · 80 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1996

Part of chain: CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jun 19, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
May 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
May 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
May 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 7, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
May 7, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Nov 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Nov 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 29, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Sep 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jun 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jun 13, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023120E
202460E
202560D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Hampshire avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.954.113.95top 28% in New Hampshire; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.960.820.69top 24% in New Hampshire; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.293.673.50top 28% in New Hampshire; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.550.550.48top 44% in New Hampshire; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.944.145.8bottom 49% in New Hampshire; top 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)58.340.942.9bottom 17% in New Hampshire; bottom 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.61, RN 0.70, weekend 3.13. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
NH Catholic Charities INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1990
Barrett, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Bernard, AlainIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Blonski, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2006
Coughlin, AdamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Demers, KateIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Desrosiers, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Ford, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Hildenbrand, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2017
Hilton, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Huard, SusanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Jalbert, JasonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Lacroix, JeffreyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2017
Libasci, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2016
McLean, JeffreyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Mirable, CatherineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Mullikin, AnuIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
NH Catholic Charities INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1990
Ouellette, RussIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Patenaude, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Coos County Nursing Home1.4 miBerlin, NH★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Berlin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305066.