How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Maple Glen Center
12-15 Saddle River Road, Fairlawn, NJ 07410 (opens Google Maps) · Bergen County · (201) 797-9522· 159 certified beds · avg 128 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 2, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. F-0838
The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. F-0919
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping. · F-0570 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Mar 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Mar 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Mar 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Apr 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 3, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 3, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Nov 9, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.40
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.89
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.07
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.40 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 32% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.89 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 19% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.07 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 30% in New Jersey; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 24% in New Jersey; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 23.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 12% in New Jersey; top 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.19, RN 0.83, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Maple Glen Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2011 |
| Gen Operations I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/01/2011 |
| Gen Operations II LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/01/2011 |
| Genesis Healthcare INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/02/2015 |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/01/2011 |
| Genesis Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/02/2015 |
| Genesis NJ Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2011 |
| Genesis Operations LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/01/2011 |
| GHC Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2011 |
| Sun Healthcare Group INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 02/02/2015 |
| Whitman, Arnold | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2011 |
| Zac Properties Xi LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2011 |
| Berg, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2012 |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
| Dublin, Trevor | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Dublin, Trevor | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Genesis Administrative Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Genesis Operations LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Mendelson, Avi | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Powerback Rehabilitation LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Genesis Healthcare — 184 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Millville Center — Millville, NJ · overall 2/5
- North Cape Center — North Cape May, NJ · overall 3/5
- Ridgewood Center — Ridgewood, NJ · overall 1/5
- Southern Ocean Center — Manahawkin, NJ · overall 4/5
- Troy Hills Center — Parsippany, NJ · overall 2/5
- Albuquerque Heights Healthcare and Rehabilitation — Albuquerque, NM · overall 2/5
- Bear Canyon Rehabilitation Center — Albuquerque, NM · overall 3/5
- Belen Meadows Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Belen, NM · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 183 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
- "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
- "How is residents' personal money protected and tracked, and how can families review the account statements?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 24% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 229 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Careone at Ridgewood Avenue | 1.6 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Family of Caring Healthcare at Ridgewood | 1.9 mi | Ridgewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bergen New Bridge Medical Center | 2.1 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home at Paramus | 2.3 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Fair Lawn Edge | 2.3 mi | Paterson, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Dellridge Health & Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Paramus, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Barnert Subacute Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 2.7 mi | Paterson, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Alaris Health at the Chateau | 3.3 mi | Rochelle Park, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Maywood | 3.4 mi | Maywood, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ridgewood Center | 3.6 mi | Ridgewood, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Careone at New Milford | 4.0 mi | New Milford, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Oradell | 4.0 mi | Oradell, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Bergen, NJ — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Oakland, NJ · overall 3/5
- Woodcliff Lake Health & Rehabilitation Center — Woodcliff Lake, NJ · overall 5/5
- Actors Fund Home — Englewood, NJ · overall 4/5
- Allendale Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Allendale, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315328.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).