How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente
10800 Flora Mae Meadows Rd, Houston, TX 77089 (opens Google Maps) · Harris County · (832) 328-2350· 128 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Mar 6, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 22, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint F-0644
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Aug 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| May 22, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint · F-0700 |
| May 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| May 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| May 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| May 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Apr 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · F-0563 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · F-0850 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.23
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.21
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.86
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.23 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.86 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 45% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.11 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 3% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.9 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 35% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 87.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 13% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.26, RN 0.21, weekend 2.89.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.26 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Booker Hospital District | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/2021 |
| Armstrong, Dwayne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2004 |
| Bartosiewiez, Matthew | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2008 |
| Booker Hospital District | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
| Clapp, Barbara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Clevenger, Josh | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/05/2021 |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Hoover, Shawn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
| Lucas, Denise | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Mougouris, Taso | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Norman, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2024 |
| Pecot, Sandra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2025 |
| Pecot, Sandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2025 |
| Regency Ihs Clinical Consulting, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
| Regency Ihs Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
| Sheppard, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/15/2002 |
| Wade, Hunter | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/17/2020 |
| Wellsential of Magnolia LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2025 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Wellsential Health — 67 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Maverick Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Eagle Pass, TX · overall 2/5
- Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Houston, TX · overall 2/5abuse
- Mission Valley Nursing and Transitional Care — Mission, TX · overall 4/5
- Monument Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — La Grange, TX · overall 4/5
- Pearsall Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Pearsall, TX · overall 4/5
- Pflugerville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Pflugerville, TX · overall 5/5
- Port Lavaca Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Port Lavaca, TX · overall 3/5
- Remington Transitional Care of San Antonio — San Antonio, TX · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 66 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Texas midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 59% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 20 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 57 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Manor of South Belt | 0.8 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Oasis at Pearland | 3.9 mi | Pearland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Suites Pasadena | 4.9 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hca Houston Healthcare Southeast | 5.0 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pasadena Post Acute | 5.4 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Webster, LLC | 5.5 mi | Webster, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Avir at Pasadena | 5.6 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Focused Care at Pasadena | 5.7 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Friendship Haven Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cen | 5.7 mi | Friendswood, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente | 5.8 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Focused Care at Webster | 6.5 mi | Webster, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Paradigm at Faith Memorial | 6.8 mi | Pasadena, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Harris, TX — 97 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy — Katy, TX · overall 3/5
- Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Houston, TX · overall 2/5abuse
- Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Houston, TX · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- North Houston Transitional Care — Houston, TX · overall 3/5
- Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Ka — Katy, TX · overall 2/5
- Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Humble — Humble, TX · overall 2/5
- Paradigm at Westbury — Houston, TX · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676333.