TexasPearsall

Pearsall Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

169 Medical Dr, Pearsall, TX 78061 · Frio County · 150 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Mar 23, 1989

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$14,255
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jul 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Jul 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Jul 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
May 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024110E
202580E
202650D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,255.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 9, 2025Fine$14,255

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.453.463.95top 39% in Texas; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.440.440.69top 38% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.063.043.50top 37% in Texas; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.340.48bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.255.345.8top 4% in Texas; top 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.354.642.9top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.42, weekend 2.92. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Reg HG Opco 1, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Regency Ihs of Pearsall, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Val Verde County Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2022
169 Medical Drive LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Baird, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Casas, CarlosIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Chagoya, JavierIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Chagoya, JavierIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Diaz, CrisIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/25/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Devine Health & Rehabilitation22.3 miDevine, TX★★★★★5/5
Lytle Nursing Home29.9 miLytle, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Community Care Center of Hondo31.8 miHondo, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Cotulla32.1 miCotulla, TX★★★★☆4/5
Jourdanton Nursing and Rehabilitation34.8 miJourdanton, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
The Heights of Atascosa36.1 miPleasanton, TX★★★★☆4/5
Pleasanton South Nursing and Rehabilitation38.0 miPleasanton, TX★★★★☆3/5
Medina Valley Health & Rehabilitation Center38.1 miCastroville, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Pleasanton North Nursing and Rehabilitation38.3 miPleasanton, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pearsall →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455797.