TexasLa Grange

Monument Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

120 State Loop 92, La Grange, TX 78945 · Fayette County · 104 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Sep 11, 1987

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,281
Fines, last 3 years
2.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 2, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 11, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 2, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 31, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jul 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 31, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340D
2024110E
202551J ▲
202610E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,281.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 2, 2025Fine$8,281

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.513.463.95bottom 3% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.440.69top 17% in Texas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.243.043.50bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.500.340.48top 13% in Texas; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.555.345.8bottom 44% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)20.054.642.9top 6% in Texas; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.57, RN 0.59, weekend 2.28. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Baird, DanielIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Gibson, PatriciaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Lucas, DeniseIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Mandelbaum, ElliotIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Reg Bridge Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Regency Ihs of la Grange LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Siptak, TrinaIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Vasquez, RaymundoIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
120 State Loop 92 LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
120 State Loop 92 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at la Grange1.5 miLa Grange, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center14.1 miSchulenburg, TX★★★★☆4/5
Parkview Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation14.1 miWeimar, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Paradigm at the Oak14.3 miSchulenburg, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Towers Nursing Home17.5 miSmithville, TX★★★★☆4/5
Flatonia Healthcare Center19.3 miFlatonia, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in La Grange →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455715.