TexasHumble

Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Humble

8450 Will Clayton Pkwy, Humble, TX 77338 · Harris County · 134 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Dec 14, 1987

Part of chain: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE (149 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
9
Serious findings on record
$418,615
Fines, last 3 years
3.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Nov 2, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0658 · triggered by a complaint

The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0693 · triggered by a complaint

The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.

Why it matters: Unnecessary or poorly managed feeding tubes can cause serious complications like lung infections and take away the ability to eat normally.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Nov 23, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 18, 2023 · F-0755 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Why it matters: Weak pharmacy services lead to medication mistakes, delays, and missed drug interactions that can seriously harm residents.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 24, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 28, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Jan 28, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Nov 2, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Jun 20, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023147K ▲
202472K ▲
202530E
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $418,615, plus 3 Medicare payment denial periods.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 2, 2024Fine$212,652
Nov 2, 2024Payment Denial45 days from Dec 3, 2024
Jun 7, 2024Fine$13,627
Oct 6, 2023Payment Denial30 days from Feb 6, 2024
Sep 18, 2023Fine$192,336
Sep 18, 2023Payment Denial33 days from Oct 21, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.223.463.95bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.440.69bottom 41% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.813.043.50bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.250.340.48bottom 37% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)91.455.345.8bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)88.954.642.9bottom 12% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.36, weekend 2.85. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Charlot, SherrelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/19/2018
Frels, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2014
Papacek, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1997
Papacek, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1997
Pritchett, GregoryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/29/1994
Sheppard, CynthiaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2013
Sheppard, CynthiaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2013
Stakes, HarryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2016
Weishaar, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2003
Wheeler, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2010
Wheeler, RichardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Focused Care at Humble1.0 miHumble, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Park Manor of Humble1.7 miHumble, TX★★★★☆3/5
Crimson Heights Health & Wellness1.8 miHumble, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center2.2 miHumble, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Fall Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.1 miHumble, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Kingwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center5.6 miKingwood, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Heights on Valley Ranch9.5 miPorter, TX★★★★☆4/5
Park Manor of Cypress Station11.0 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
The Heights of North Houston11.1 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Ashford Gardens11.4 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Paradigm Northwest11.5 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avir at Veterans Memorial11.8 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Humble →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455725.