TexasKaty

Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Ka

1525 Tull Dr, Katy, TX 77449 · Harris County · 130 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Apr 30, 1987

Part of chain: CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE (149 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,281
Fines, last 3 years
3.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 12, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 6, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Nov 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Nov 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Nov 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 15, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Nov 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Sep 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
2024130F
202521J ▲
2026110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,281.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 6, 2025Fine$8,281

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.283.463.95bottom 47% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.440.69top 17% in Texas; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.953.043.50top 47% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.340.48top 19% in Texas; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)92.655.345.8bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.054.642.9bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.91, RN 0.52, weekend 2.62. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Booker, MarilynIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2020
Falcone, LynnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2015
Frels, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2014
Papacek, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1997
Papacek, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1997
Sheppard, AnnaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2019
Sheppard, CynthiaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2013
Sheppard, CynthiaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2013
Weishaar, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2003
Wheeler, RichardIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2010
Wheeler, RichardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/27/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mason Creek Transitional Care of Katy0.9 miKaty, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Solera at West Houston2.2 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Falcon Point Post Acute2.6 miKaty, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Ignite Medical Resort Katy, LLC3.1 miKaty, TX★★★★☆3/5
Sterling Oaks Rehabilitation3.6 miKaty, TX★★★★☆4/5
Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation5.1 miKaty, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Paradigm at Katy5.9 miKaty, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
West Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation7.0 miHouston, TX★★★★☆4/5
Park Manor of Westchase7.0 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Parkway Place7.2 miHouston, TX★★★★★3/5
Avir at Houston7.9 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Copperfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation8.1 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Katy →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455703.