MassachusettsLeeds

Linda Manor Extended Care Facility

349 Haydenville Road, Leeds, MA 01053 · Hampshire County · 123 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Oct 3, 1989

Part of chain: INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE (14 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$8,788
Fines, last 3 years
4.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 6, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 6, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 16, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 29, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 6, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
Jul 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jul 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jul 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jul 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130E
2024100E
202552G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,788.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 6, 2025Fine$8,788

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.023.893.95top 33% in Massachusetts; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.710.650.69top 28% in Massachusetts; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.483.513.50top 41% in Massachusetts; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.460.48top 46% in Massachusetts; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.438.245.8bottom 14% in Massachusetts; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.542.642.9bottom 46% in Massachusetts; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.70, weekend 3.41. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cec Management Systems INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/30/2022
Integritus Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/30/2022
Integritus Healthcare Management Services INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2022
Cec Management Systems INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Cec Management Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Gingras, Marcie JoIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Gingras, Marcie JoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Heinze, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Heinze, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Integritus Healthcare Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Integritus Healthcare Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2025
Jones, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2022
Jones, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2022
Jones, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Whitcomb, WinthropIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Care One at Northampton2.9 miNorthampton, MA★★★★☆3/5
Hadley Pointe Nursing Rehab & Care7.3 miHadley, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Center for Extended Care at Amherst8.2 miAmherst, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Care One at Holyoke9.6 miHolyoke, MA★★★★★5/5
Day Brook Village Senior Living10.7 miHolyoke, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
South Hadley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center11.1 miSouth Hadley, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Regalcare at Holyoke11.2 miHolyoke, MA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Renaissance Manor on Cabot11.3 miHolyoke, MA★★★★★4/5
Massachusetts Veterans Home at Holyoke11.4 miHolyoke, MA—/5
Mission Care at Holyoke13.0 miHolyoke, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Mont Marie Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center13.4 miHolyoke, MA★★★★☆3/5
Mary's Meadow at Providence Place14.0 miHolyoke, MA★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Leeds →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225363.