LouisianaWinnsboro

Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation Winnsboro

804 Polk Street, Winnsboro, LA 71295 · Franklin County · 150 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1996

Part of chain: LEGACY NURSING & REHABILITATION (9 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$160,593
Fines, last 3 years
3.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · May 15, 2024 · F-0690

The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jun 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 15, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 17, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 9, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jul 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
May 15, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
May 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202321G ▲
2024152H ▲
2025110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $160,593.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 7, 2024Fine$151,769
Feb 15, 2024Fine$8,824

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.644.043.95bottom 32% in Louisiana; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.280.320.69top 47% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.033.453.50bottom 30% in Louisiana; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.130.200.48bottom 41% in Louisiana; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)65.347.645.8bottom 10% in Louisiana; bottom 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.741.642.9bottom 18% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.81, RN 0.29, weekend 3.18. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Dgprejean, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Gum, JohnIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Holyfield, MylesIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Jdgum, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
LP Holdings, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Mylesh, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Prejean, DanielleIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
VDG LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Dgprejean, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Gum, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Gum, VictorIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Gum, VictorIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Gum, VictorIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2026
Gum, VictorIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Holyfield, MylesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Jdgum, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Laing, DanielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Laing, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/04/2025
Legacy Management Group, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Legacy Management Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Plantation Manor Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC1.5 miWinnsboro, LA★★★★☆4/5
Mary Anna Nursing Home13.3 miWisner, LA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Plantation Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center14.1 miWisner, LA★★☆☆☆2/5
Rayville Nursing and Rehabilitation18.3 miRayville, LA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Winnsboro →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195392.