How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Las Ventanas Retirement Comm SNF
10401 West Charleston Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89135 (opens Google Maps) · Clark County · (702) 360-2662· 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Apr 6, 2007 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HUMANGOOD (17 facilities, chain avg rating 4.5★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 27, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. F-0694
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Jul 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Jul 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| Jul 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jul 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Jul 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Aug 24, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNevada averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.01
Nevada average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.55
Nevada average: 0.98
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.62
Nevada average: 3.61
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nevada avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.01 | 4.05 | 3.95 | top 13% in Nevada; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.55 | 0.98 | 0.69 | top 13% in Nevada; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.62 | 3.61 | 3.50 | top 11% in Nevada; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.35 | 0.87 | 0.48 | top 16% in Nevada; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 28.6 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 7% in Nevada; top 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 43.4 | 42.9 | top 21% in Nevada; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.03, RN 1.55, weekend 4.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Las Ventanas Retirement Comm SNF. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humangood | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2016 |
| Humangood Cornerstone | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2016 |
| Humangood Nevada | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/30/2004 |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/21/2025 |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2024 |
| Baker, Judith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Brown, Herman | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2013 |
| Brown, Herman | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2013 |
| Brown, Herman | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2013 |
| Cochrane, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/10/2009 |
| Cochrane, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/10/2009 |
| Dahan, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Decker, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Ferris, Rand | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/25/2017 |
| Fuller, Randall | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2020 |
| Fuller, Randall | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2020 |
| Ghassemi, Bethany | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2019 |
| Ghassemi, Bethany | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2019 |
| Jeong, Mike | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2007 |
| Jeong, Mike | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2007 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Humangood — 17 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Village at Hillside — McMinnville, OR · overall 5/5
- Rydal Park of Philadelphia Presbytery Homes, INC — Rydal, PA · overall 4/5
- Judson Park Health Center — Des Moines, WA · overall 5/5
- Summitview Rehab and Health Center — Yakima, WA · overall 5/5
- The Terraces of Phoenix — Phoenix, AZ · overall 5/5
- Piedmont Gardens Health Facility — Oakland, CA · overall 5/5
- Plymouth Village — Redlands, CA · overall 4/5
- Redwood Terrace Health Center — Escondido, CA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 16 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 29% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 31 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 36 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Heights of Summerlin, LLC | 0.1 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Neurorestorative | 3.3 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab | 4.2 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Silver Ridge Healthcare Center | 5.0 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Torrey Pines Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 5.0 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Advanced Health Care of Summerlin | 5.3 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Las Vegas | 5.4 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Neurorestorative | 5.5 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Silver Hills Health Care Center | 5.6 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Canyon Vista Post Acute | 6.1 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab | 6.4 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Spanish Hills Wellness Suites | 6.7 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Clark, NV — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Life Care Center of South Las Vegas — Las Vegas, NV · overall 2/5SFF
- Marquis Care at Centennial Hills — Las Vegas, NV · overall 4/5
- Mission Pines Nursing and Rehab Center — North Las Vegas, NV · overall 3/5
- Mountain View Care Center — Boulder City, NV · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295086.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).