How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1028 Topping Lane, Hampton, VA 23666 (opens Google Maps) · Hampton City County · (757) 826-4922· 70 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. F-0623
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Oct 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Mar 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Mar 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 6, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2021 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.16 | 3.67 | 3.95 | bottom 35% in Virginia; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 49% in Virginia; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.55 | 3.21 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Virginia; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 47% in Virginia; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 49% in Virginia; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 48.2 | 42.9 | top 30% in Virginia; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.59, weekend 2.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Langley Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation · changed ownership in the last 12 months
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kahanow, Aviva | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2025 |
| Langley Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/10/2025 |
| Rokeach, Fraide | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2025 |
| VA Holdings Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/10/2025 |
| Buckley, Erik | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2025 |
| Dick, Jennifer | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/02/2026 |
| Dick, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/02/2026 |
| Dick, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/02/2026 |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2025 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Healthcare Services Group INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Healthcare Services Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2025 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2025 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2025 |
| Rokowsky, Yitzchok | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hampton Health & Rehab Center, LLC | 1.1 mi | Hampton, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Atlantic View Post Acute | 1.6 mi | Newport News, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marcella Post Acute | 2.0 mi | Hampton, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Newport Post Acute | 2.5 mi | Newport News, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Chesapeake | 3.4 mi | Newport News, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waterview Health & Rehab Center | 4.3 mi | Hampton, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Newport News Nursing & Rehab | 5.8 mi | Newport News, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bayside of Poquoson Health and Rehab | 6.0 mi | Poquoson, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Riverside Lifelong H & R Warwick Forest | 7.4 mi | Newport News, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Old Dominion Rehabilitation and Nursing | 8.2 mi | Newport News, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Regency Health and Rehabilitation Center | 8.3 mi | Yorktown, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riverside Lifelong Health & Rehab Smithfield | 10.7 mi | Smithfield, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495367.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details