The Boulevard Post Acute
9229 Arlington Blvd, Fairfax, VA 22031 · Fairfax City County · 81 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Apr 3, 1997
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 9, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 5, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 10, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 22, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 27, 2020 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 17, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (33)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. |
| Feb 27, 2020 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 15).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 15 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.36 | 3.67 | 3.95 | bottom 50% in Virginia; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 17% in Virginia; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.07 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 39% in Virginia; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 12% in Virginia; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.0 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 33% in Virginia; top 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.9 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in Virginia; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.15, RN 1.02, weekend 3.79. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boulevard Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| SK Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Skilled Venture LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Bhardwaj, Prita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Bhardwaj, Prita | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Boulevard Leasehold LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Eagle Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Law, Joseph | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2020 |
| Law, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2020 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2025 |
| Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can I get a written copy of resident rights, house rules, and a full list of services and charges today?"
- "How do you communicate important notices to residents who speak another language or have trouble seeing or hearing?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| August Healthcare at Iliff | 2.9 mi | Dunn Loring, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fairfax Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.0 mi | Fairfax, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Annandale Healthcare Center | 5.1 mi | Annandale, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| August Healthcare at Leewood | 5.4 mi | Annandale, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Burke Health & Rehabilitation Center | 5.6 mi | Burke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vierra Falls Church | 6.1 mi | Falls Church, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fair Oaks Health & Rehabilitation | 6.2 mi | Fairfax, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Arleigh Burke Pavilion | 7.0 mi | MC Lean, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Carlin Springs Health & Rehabilitation | 7.3 mi | Arlington, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greenspring Village | 7.5 mi | Springfield, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Goodwin House Bailey's Crossroads | 7.8 mi | Falls Church, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Jefferson | 8.2 mi | Arlington, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495319.