How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Ignite Medical Resort St Marys LLC
111 Mock Avenue, Blue Springs, MO 64014 (opens Google Maps) · Jackson County · (816) 220-4200· 130 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 27, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 27, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 27, 2024 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 27, 2024 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 35 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
View all 35 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Jan 14, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 19).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 19
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 19 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.95
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.45
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.58
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.95 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 21% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 44% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.58 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 39% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 52.9 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 40% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 26% in Missouri; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.15, RN 0.48, weekend 2.75.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ignite Medical Resort St Marys LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carr, Jared | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Eddleman, Mindy | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Gillis, Karen | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Gobst, Ryan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Gold Pearl, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Ignite St Marys JV LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 11/01/2020 |
| Israel Investment Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Jablonski, Nicole | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| McFarlane, John | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Prestige Worldwide St Marys LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 11/01/2020 |
| Rogers, Dylan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Thengil, Mathew | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| White, Jim | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Berger Fam Tr Ua 06252014 | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Berger Fam Tr Ua 06252014 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Berger, Aviva | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Berger, Menachem | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Blue Pearl Financial LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2021 |
| Carr, Barry | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Carr, Barry | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
Showing 20 of 59 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 39 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ignite Medical Resorts — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Ignite Medical Resort St Peters — Saint Peters, MO · overall —/5
- Ignite Medical Resort Adams Parc — Bartlesville, OK · overall 5/5
- Ignite Medical Resort Norman, LLC — Norman, OK · overall 1/5
- Ignite Medical Resort Okc, LLC — Oklahoma City, OK · overall 2/5
- Ignite Medical Resort Tulsa, LLC — Tulsa, OK · overall 5/5
- Ignite Medical Resort el Paso, LLC — El Paso, TX · overall 1/5SFF
- Ignite Medical Resort Fort Worth, LLC — Fort Worth, TX · overall 2/5
- Ignite Medical Resort Katy, LLC — Katy, TX · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 59 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 49 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation | 0.9 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Ignite Medical Resort Blue Springs | 4.2 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 4.5 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Villages of Jackson Creek | 5.0 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sunterra Springs Independence | 5.4 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Wilshire at Lakewood Rehab Center | 6.4 mi | Lees Summit, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Abode Health and Wellness Center | 7.0 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Rehabilitation Center of Independence, the | 7.0 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove | 7.3 mi | Oak Grove, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| University Health Lakewood Medical Center | 7.6 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Seasons Rehab and Healthcare Center | 7.9 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Carmel Hills Wellness & Rehabilitation | 8.7 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Jackson, MO — 39 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Independence Manor Care Center — Independence, MO · overall 3/5
- Jeanne Jugan Center — Kansas City, MO · overall 5/5
- Jefferson Health Care — Lees Summit, MO · overall 1/5
- John Knox Village Care Center — Lees Summit, MO · overall 4/5
- Kingswood Senior Living — Kansas City, MO · overall 3/5
- Lee's Summit Place — Lees Summit, MO · overall 3/5
- Life Care Center of Grandview — Grandview, MO · overall 2/5abuse
- Maywood Terrace Living Center — Independence, MO · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265759.