MissouriBlue Springs

Ignite Medical Resort St Marys LLC

111 Mock Avenue, Blue Springs, MO 64014 · Jackson County · 130 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 2003

Part of chain: IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS (22 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 27, 2024 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 27, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 27, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Aug 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Oct 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Oct 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Oct 25, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Oct 25, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jan 14, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 14, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 14, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 14, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jan 14, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 19).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202090E
202270E
2024191G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.953.663.95bottom 21% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.490.69top 44% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.583.223.50bottom 22% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.230.330.48bottom 39% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.956.045.8top 40% in Missouri; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.347.842.9top 26% in Missouri; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.15, RN 0.48, weekend 2.75. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Carr, JaredIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Eddleman, MindyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Gillis, KarenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Gobst, RyanIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Gold Pearl, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Ignite St Marys JV LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%11/01/2020
Israel Investment TrOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Jablonski, NicoleIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
McFarlane, JohnIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Prestige Worldwide St Marys LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%11/01/2020
Rogers, DylanIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Thengil, MathewIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
White, JimIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Berger Fam Tr Ua 06252014Organization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Berger Fam Tr Ua 06252014OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Berger, AvivaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Berger, MenachemIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Blue Pearl Financial LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Carr, BarryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Carr, BarryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Blue Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation0.9 miBlue Springs, MO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Ignite Medical Resort Blue Springs4.2 miBlue Springs, MO★★★★★4/5
Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care Center4.5 miIndependence, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Villages of Jackson Creek5.0 miIndependence, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Sunterra Springs Independence5.4 miIndependence, MO★★★★★4/5
Wilshire at Lakewood Rehab Center6.4 miLees Summit, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Abode Health and Wellness Center7.0 miIndependence, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Rehabilitation Center of Independence, the7.0 miIndependence, MO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove7.3 miOak Grove, MO★★☆☆☆4/5
University Health Lakewood Medical Center7.6 miKansas City, MO★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Blue Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265759.