Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove
2108 SW Mitchell Street, Oak Grove, MO 64075 · Jackson County · 90 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Nov 22, 2000
Part of chain: ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (27)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jan 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint |
| Aug 2, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Aug 2, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint |
| Nov 16, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.27 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 35% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 49% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.74 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 28% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in Missouri; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.9 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 12% in Missouri; top 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 47.8 | 42.9 | bottom 29% in Missouri; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.73, RN 0.35, weekend 2.28. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calvert, Gregg | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 12% | 05/01/2022 |
| Steele, Sheri | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 05/01/2022 |
| Brown, Daniel | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Brown, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Calvert, Gregg | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Calvert, Gregg | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "Is signing an arbitration agreement required for admission, and can we refuse it without affecting my family member's care?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation | 7.0 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Ignite Medical Resort St Marys LLC | 7.3 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Odessa Health Care Center | 9.2 mi | Odessa, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Blue Springs | 11.4 mi | Blue Springs, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 11.8 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Villages of Jackson Creek | 12.3 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wilshire at Lakewood Rehab Center | 12.5 mi | Lees Summit, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sunterra Springs Independence | 12.7 mi | Independence, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| University Health Lakewood Medical Center | 13.8 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rehabilitation Center of Independence, the | 14.1 mi | Independence, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Abode Health and Wellness Center | 14.2 mi | Independence, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Seasons Rehab and Healthcare Center | 14.3 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265710.