MissouriKansas City

Seasons Rehab and Healthcare Center

15600 Woods Chapel Road, Kansas City, MO 64139 · Jackson County · 78 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Jun 17, 2014

Part of chain: AMA HOLDINGS (13 facilities, chain avg rating 1.6★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
May 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Jun 28, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings.
Jun 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 28, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 28, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021110F
202350F
202410D
202540E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.643.663.95top 48% in Missouri; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.490.69bottom 39% in Missouri; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.193.223.50top 48% in Missouri; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.330.48bottom 28% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.756.045.8bottom 46% in Missouri; bottom 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.347.842.9top 26% in Missouri; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.37, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ama Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/19/2021
Def Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/19/2021
Marx, AsherIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/19/2021
Mo Operation Holdings de Spe LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest99%01/25/2024
Wolf, JacquesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/19/2021
Marx, AsherIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/19/2021
Mo Operation Holdings de Spe LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2024
Moore, AngelaIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE10/19/2021
Wolf, JacquesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/19/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
University Health Lakewood Medical Center0.5 miKansas City, MO★★★★☆4/5
Wilshire at Lakewood Rehab Center1.7 miLees Summit, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Edgewood Manor Health Care Center2.5 miRaytown, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Alpine Breeze Health and Wellness4.0 miRaytown, MO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
John Knox Village Care Center4.3 miLees Summit, MO★★★★☆4/5
Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care Center4.5 miIndependence, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Ignite Medical Resort Blue Springs4.7 miBlue Springs, MO★★★★★4/5
Villages of Jackson Creek4.9 miIndependence, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Lee's Summit Place5.0 miLees Summit, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Sunterra Springs Independence5.1 miIndependence, MO★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Kansas City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265850.