MissouriLees Summit

Lee's Summit Place

1501 SW 3rd Street, Lees Summit, MO 64081 · Jackson County · 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 1992

Part of chain: VERTICAL HEALTH SERVICES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 7, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 8, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Sep 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 5, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 5, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 5, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
May 5, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 5, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
May 5, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
May 5, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
May 5, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
May 5, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
May 5, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2022160F
202390F
202541G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.233.663.95bottom 8% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.670.490.69top 15% in Missouri; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing1.883.223.50bottom 8% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.670.330.48top 4% in Missouri; top 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)73.956.045.8bottom 10% in Missouri; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)68.847.842.9bottom 19% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.91, RN 0.87, weekend 2.46. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Miller, WilliamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Vertical Health Services LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
VHS Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
VHS Mo Opco Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
VHS Ultimate Parent LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
3rd St Consulting LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
3rd St Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/17/2025
Bax, AmyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/23/2025
Bax, AmyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2025
Miller, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Tadakamalla, SrinathIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Tadakamalla, SrinathIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Jefferson Health Care0.9 miLees Summit, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
John Knox Village Care Center1.0 miLees Summit, MO★★★★☆4/5
Raintree Village3.5 miLees Summit, MO—/5
University Health Lakewood Medical Center4.7 miKansas City, MO★★★★☆4/5
Seasons Rehab and Healthcare Center5.0 miKansas City, MO★★★★☆4/5
Edgewood Manor Health Care Center5.1 miRaytown, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Wilshire at Lakewood Rehab Center5.3 miLees Summit, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Jeanne Jugan Center6.2 miKansas City, MO★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Grandview6.5 miGrandview, MO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Alpine Breeze Health and Wellness7.7 miRaytown, MO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Sunrise Nursing & Rehabilitation8.2 miRaymore, MO★★★☆☆2/5
Foxwood Springs Living Center8.2 miRaymore, MO★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lees Summit →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265512.