How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Holladay Healthcare Center
4782 South Holladay Boulevard, Salt Lake City, UT 84117 (opens Google Maps) · Salt Lake County · (801) 277-7002· 120 certified beds · avg 80 residents/day · certified since Feb 13, 1987 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 24, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. F-0638
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
View all 25 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint · F-0728 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 16, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. · F-0811 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.47
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.65
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.07
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.47 | 3.87 | 3.95 | bottom 41% in Utah; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 1.17 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in Utah; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.07 | 3.39 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Utah; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.48 | bottom 38% in Utah; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.8 | 50.7 | 45.8 | top 31% in Utah; top 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 40.6 | 42.9 | top 22% in Utah; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.67, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.59 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Holladay Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2007 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Cottonwood Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Moss, Tyler | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Olympus Health, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Olympus Health, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2025 |
| Wallace, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Wallace, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Workman, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2024 |
| Workman, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/20/2024 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Hurricane Health and Rehabilitation — Hurricane, UT · overall 2/5
- Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center — Washington Terrace, UT · overall 5/5
- Orem Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Orem, UT · overall 3/5
- Paramount Health and Rehabilitation — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 3/5
- Pinnacle Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Price, UT · overall 5/5
- Pointe Meadows Health and Rehabilitation — Lehi, UT · overall 5/5
- Provo Rehabilitation and Nursing — Provo, UT · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- South Davis Specialty Care — Bountiful, UT · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Utah midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 38 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring Creek Healthcare Center | 1.1 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Highland Care Center | 1.4 mi | Holladay, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Cottonwood Creek | 2.1 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Millcreek | 2.2 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mt. Olympus Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Canyon Rim | 2.4 mi | Millcreek, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rocky Mountain Care - Cottage on Vine | 3.0 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Monument Healthcare Murray Creek | 3.0 mi | Millcreek, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Paramount Health and Rehabilitation | 3.4 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Millcreek Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.5 mi | Salt Lake City, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Aspen Ridge Transitional Rehab | 3.5 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aspen Ridge West Transitional Rehab | 4.2 mi | Murray, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Salt Lake, UT — 35 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Legacy Village Rehabilitation — Taylorsville, UT · overall 2/5
- Little Cottonwood Rehabilitation and Nursing — South Salt Lake, UT · overall 5/5
- Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 1/5abuse
- Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 2/5abuse
- Meadow Peak Rehabilitation — Taylorsville, UT · overall 3/5
- Midtown Manor — Salt Lake City, UT · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465109.