How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
375 East 5350 South, Washington Terrace, UT 84405 (opens Google Maps) · Weber County · (801) 479-5700· 108 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint F-0607
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| May 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes. · F-0811 |
| Aug 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Aug 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Aug 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Aug 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.96 | 3.87 | 3.95 | top 28% in Utah; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 1.17 | 0.69 | bottom 27% in Utah; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.55 | 3.39 | 3.50 | top 26% in Utah; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.88 | 0.48 | bottom 28% in Utah; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.0 | 50.7 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in Utah; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 55.6 | 40.6 | 42.9 | bottom 25% in Utah; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.80, weekend 3.43.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.84 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Moss, Tyler | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Muir, Garth | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/09/2023 |
| Muir, Garth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/09/2023 |
| Muir, Garth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/09/2023 |
| Nordic Valley Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| The Ensign Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Washington Heights Healthcare, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Washington Heights Healthcare, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/22/2025 |
| Wensel, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Wensel, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
| Wensel, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2016 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Terrace Transitional | 0.0 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stonehenge of Ogden | 1.0 mi | Washington Terrace, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| South Ogden Post-Acute (cascades at South Ogden) | 1.1 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mountain View Health Services | 1.7 mi | Ogden, UT | —/5 | SFF | |
| Pine View Transitional Rehab | 1.9 mi | South Ogden, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing | 2.3 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 2.6 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | Roy, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield | 5.4 mi | Clearfield, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Fairfield Village Rehabilitation | 6.3 mi | Layton, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care Center | 6.4 mi | Clearfield, UT | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC | 7.3 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Weber, UT — 11 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465069.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details