UtahTaylorsville

Meadow Peak Rehabilitation

6084 South Summit Vista Boulevard, Taylorsville, UT 84129 · Salt Lake County · 75 certified beds · avg 69 residents/day · certified since Apr 28, 2021

Part of chain: MISSION HEALTH SERVICES (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 23, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 27, 2022 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 12, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Jul 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Oct 27, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 27, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 27, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202281G ▲
202441G ▲
202510D
2026120E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.643.873.95top 46% in Utah; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.191.170.69top 36% in Utah; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.203.393.50top 39% in Utah; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.990.880.48top 26% in Utah; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)27.450.745.8top 5% in Utah; top 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)31.840.642.9top 39% in Utah; top 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.03, RN 1.32, weekend 3.55. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bartholomew, BrendaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Gangotena-Bernard, FatimaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Hardman, MichelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Hardman, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2020
Keele, EddieIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2025
Meadow Peak SV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Mission Health ServicesOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Mission Health ServicesOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2025
Murray, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Piquet, ShaeleenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Wootton, ZacharyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Wootton, ZacharyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Zimbelman, MichelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Zimbelman, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow1.6 miWest Valley City, UT★★☆☆☆1/5
Legacy Village Rehabilitation4.0 miTaylorsville, UT★★☆☆☆3/5
Alpine Meadow Rehabilitation and Nursing4.4 miWest Valley City, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Monument Healthcare Taylorsville5.8 miSalt Lake City, UT★★☆☆☆2/5
Aspen Ridge West Transitional Rehab6.8 miMurray, UT★★★★★4/5
Little Cottonwood Rehabilitation and Nursing6.8 miSouth Salt Lake, UT★★★★★5/5
Pine Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing7.0 miSalt Lake City, UT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Midtown Manor7.2 miSalt Lake City, UT★☆☆☆☆2/5
Cascades at Riverwalk7.3 miMidvale, UT★★★★☆3/5
Paramount Health and Rehabilitation7.4 miSalt Lake City, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Meadow Brook Rehabilitation and Nursing7.4 miSalt Lake City, UT★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Monument Healthcare South Salt Lake7.5 miSalt Lake City, UT★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Taylorsville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465192.