PennsylvaniaExeter

Highland Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

750 Schooley Avenue, Exeter, PA 18643 · Luzerne County · 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1983

Part of chain: CONTINUUM HEALTHCARE (13 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$19,760
Fines, last 3 years
3.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 10, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
May 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Oct 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · from a complaint
Jan 10, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Nov 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 24, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360E
2024231G ▲
202520E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $19,760.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 14, 2023Fine$19,760

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.663.943.95top 50% in Pennsylvania; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.580.800.69bottom 40% in Pennsylvania; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.403.583.50top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.560.48bottom 27% in Pennsylvania; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.444.545.8top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)7.739.942.9top 3% in Pennsylvania; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.57, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bruckstein, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Bruckstein, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Continuum Healthcare I INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Continuum Healthcare I INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Dorn, CherylIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Execucare AssociatesOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2025
Execucare AssociatesOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Highland Manor Real Property, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Highland Manor Real Property, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Leshkowitz & Company LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Leshkowitz & Company LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2025
Litman, WarrenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Litman, WarrenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Mandelbaum, DanielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Martin, TravisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2024
Martin, TravisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2024
Musto, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Musto, KevinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Stonebridge Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019
Stonebridge Healthcare Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Wesley Village2.7 miPittston, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Embassy of East Mountain5.2 miWilkes-Barre, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Maple Ridge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center5.2 miKingston, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Third Avenue Health & Rehab Center5.4 miKingston, PA★★★★☆3/5
Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.7 miDallas, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Riverstreet Manor5.7 miWilkes-Barre, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Edenbrook on Second Ave6.0 miKingston, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Heinz Transitional Rehabilitation Unit6.2 miWilkes-Barre, PA★★★★★4/5
Oak Ridge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center6.4 miTaylor, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Embassy of Wyoming Valley6.5 miWilkes Barre, PA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Exeter →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395566.