Indiana ›Noblesville

Harbour Manor Health & Living Community

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1667 Sheridan Rd, Noblesville, IN 46060 (opens Google Maps) · Hamilton County · (317) 773-9205· 129 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Jul 8, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CARDON & ASSOCIATES (19 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 5, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jan 2, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 2, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint F-0726

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint F-0732

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761

View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 19, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
May 19, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732
May 19, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Feb 13, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jan 2, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Jan 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607
Jan 2, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Oct 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Apr 24, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
Feb 16, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Oct 30, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202430D
202561G ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.46
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.61
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.85
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.463.423.95top 38% in Indiana; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.610.620.69top 41% in Indiana; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.853.013.50bottom 49% in Indiana; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.470.48bottom 41% in Indiana; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.145.945.8top 36% in Indiana; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.440.442.9top 31% in Indiana; top 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.30, RN 0.59, weekend 2.72.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.30 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Harbour Manor Health & Living Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Riverview HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2011
Ankura Consulting Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/15/2022
Atkinson, JacobIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Atkinson, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Atkinson, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Balla, MatthewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Balla, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Balla, MatthewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2022
Bradley & Associates INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Cardon and Associates INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2013
Cardon and Associates INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2025
Cardon Management Company LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2011
Cardon Management Company LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/27/2025
Cattell, ZacharyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2022
Cattell, ZacharyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2022
Cattell, ZacharyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2022
Cole Marketing Communications INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Fauth, KendraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2021
Fauth, KendraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2021
Fauth, KendraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2021

Showing 20 of 71 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 51 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Cardon & Associates — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
  • "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
  • "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
  • "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Indiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 71 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 51 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Riverwalk Village0.7 miNoblesville, IN★★★★☆4/5
Prairie Lakes Health Campus4.3 miNoblesville, IN★★★★★4/5
Maple Park Village5.1 miWestfield, IN★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Bridgewater Healthcare Center5.4 miCarmel, IN★★★★★4/5
McGivney Health Care Center5.9 miCarmel, IN★★☆☆☆3/5
Wellbrooke of Westfield6.0 miWestfield, IN★★★★★4/5
Hamilton Trace of Fishers6.8 miFishers, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Restoracy of Carmel7.5 miCarmel, IN★★★★☆3/5
Allisonville Meadows8.1 miFishers, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Carmel Health & Living Community8.2 miCarmel, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Majestic Care of Carmel8.4 miCarmel, IN★★☆☆☆3/5
Barrington of Carmel, the8.5 miCarmel, IN★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Hamilton, IN — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Noblesville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155381.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details