Terrace at Solarbron the

1701 McDowell Rd, Evansville, IN 47712 (opens Google Maps) · Vanderburgh County · (812) 985-0055· 91 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Dec 12, 2008 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CARDON & ASSOCIATES (19 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Mar 3, 2026

Serious findings on record

most recent Oct 31, 2023

Fines, last 3 years

3.92

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 31, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Nov 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 31 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
Mar 3, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761

View all 31 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 3, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Mar 3, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Mar 3, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 3, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Sep 10, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Sep 10, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Feb 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint · F-0635
Dec 10, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Dec 10, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jul 11, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Oct 31, 2023	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Oct 31, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Oct 31, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Oct 31, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
Oct 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Oct 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Oct 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Oct 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Oct 31, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Oct 31, 2023	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 13).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	10	1	G ▲
2024	5	0	E
2025	3	0	D
2026	13	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.92

3.42

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.56

0.62

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.43

3.01

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Indiana avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.92	3.42	3.95	top 17% in Indiana; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.56	0.62	0.69	bottom 49% in Indiana; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.43	3.01	3.50	top 18% in Indiana; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.28	0.47	0.48	bottom 19% in Indiana; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	67.0	45.9	45.8	bottom 5% in Indiana; bottom 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	50.0	40.4	42.9	bottom 35% in Indiana; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.50, weekend 3.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.53 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Terrace at Solarbron the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Other

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Good Samaritan Hospital	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	07/01/2016
Balla, Matthew	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/23/2022
Balla, Matthew	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/23/2022
Cardon and Associates INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/23/2013
Cardon and Associates INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/17/2025
Cardon Management Company LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2011
Cardon Management Company LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/04/2025
Cattell, Zachary	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/07/2025
Cattell, Zachary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/07/2025
Crowe, Robin	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	04/15/2024
Crowe, Robin	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/15/2024
Crowe, Robin	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/15/2024
Emerson, Mark	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/15/2018
Emerson, Mark	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/15/2018
Fauth, Kendra	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/26/2021
Fauth, Kendra	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/26/2021
Gormal, Gregg	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2016
Gormal, Gregg	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2016
Haug, Amy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/04/2022
Haug, Amy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/04/2022

Showing 20 of 39 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 19 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Cardon & Associates — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

University Heights Health and Living Community — Indianapolis, IN · overall 4/5
Altenheim Health & Living Community — Indianapolis, IN · overall 4/5
Arbor Trace Health & Living Community — Richmond, IN · overall 5/5
Aspen Trace Health & Living Community — Greenwood, IN · overall 5/5
Bell Trace Health and Living Center — Bloomington, IN · overall 5/5
Brown County Health and Living Community — Nashville, IN · overall 5/5
Carmel Health & Living Community — Carmel, IN · overall 2/5
Copper Trace Health & Living Community — Westfield, IN · overall 3/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 67% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 39 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 25 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
West River Health Campus	1.0 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★★☆	3/5
Park Terrace Village	2.5 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
River Bend Nursing and Rehabilitation	4.4 mi	Evansville, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Parkview Care Center	5.7 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★☆☆	2/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Woodbridge Care Center	6.3 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★☆☆	3/5
Envive of River City	6.3 mi	Evansville, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Columbia Healthcare Center	6.4 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Brentwood Care Center	6.6 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★★★	5/5
Heritage Center	7.0 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
North Park Nursing Center	7.1 mi	Evansville, IN	★★★★☆	3/5
Bethel Manor	7.7 mi	Evansville, IN	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Aperion Care Lincoln	7.8 mi	Evansville, IN	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Vanderburgh, IN — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Envive of Evansville — Evansville, IN · overall 1/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Evansville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155773.