13575 58th Street North, Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (651) 430-7200· 108 certified beds · avg 101 residents/day · certified since Mar 4, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES & SERVICES (21 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 30, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 30, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2024 | Payment Denial | 12 days from Jun 27, 2024 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Minnesota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.45 | 4.83 | 3.95 | top 19% in Minnesota; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.71 | 1.22 | 0.69 | top 12% in Minnesota; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.16 | 4.27 | 3.50 | top 11% in Minnesota; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.48 | top 9% in Minnesota; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.0 | 42.2 | 45.8 | top 25% in Minnesota; top 16% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 22% in Minnesota; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.65, RN 1.46, weekend 4.41.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.65 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Gables of Boutwells Landing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valley Senior Services Alliance | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/05/2005 |
| Computershare Corporate Trust Company, Na | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Computershare Corporate Trust Company, Na | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2024 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/05/2015 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| Meyer, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| Middleton, Gavin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Middleton, Gavin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2019 |
| Pederson, Jane | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Pederson, Jane | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Pederson, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Peterson, Heidi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2011 |
| PHS Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/24/2025 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Homes & Services — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Estates at Greeley LLC | 1.6 mi | Stillwater, MN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Estates at Linden LLC | 2.2 mi | Stillwater, MN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Stillwater | 2.4 mi | Stillwater, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Christian Community Home | 6.0 mi | Hudson, WI | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Maplewood Rehabilitation Center | 9.4 mi | Maplewood, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cerenity Care Center White Bear Lake | 10.0 mi | White Bear Lake, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harmony Gardens | 10.2 mi | Maplewood, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodbury Health Care Center | 10.8 mi | Woodbury, MN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Therese of Woodbury LLC | 11.4 mi | Woodbury, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood | 12.2 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC | 12.4 mi | Saint Paul, MN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waverly Gardens | 12.8 mi | North Oaks, MN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Washington, MN — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245615.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details