How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Future Care Northpoint
1046 Old North Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21224 (opens Google Maps) · Baltimore County · (410) 282-0100· 180 certified beds · avg 144 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 27, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 34 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint F-0578
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
View all 34 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · F-0567 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 19, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 13).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2018
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 14 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMaryland averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.40
Maryland average: 3.83
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.63
Maryland average: 0.83
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.02
Maryland average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.40 | 3.83 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Maryland; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.69 | bottom 40% in Maryland; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.02 | 3.43 | 3.50 | bottom 37% in Maryland; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.48 | top 29% in Maryland; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.1 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 47% in Maryland; top 37% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.9 | 38.7 | 42.9 | top 22% in Maryland; top 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.66, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.58 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Future Care Northpoint. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Gilden, Shellye | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Levitas, Wende | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Seven Grand C, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2007 |
| Simba, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 11/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| FC of Eastpoint | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| FC of Eastpoint | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/16/2025 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Future Care Health and Management Corporation | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Future Care Health and Management Corporation | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/16/2025 |
| Harrington, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
| Harrington, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2007 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Future Care/Lifebridge Health — 18 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Future Care Old Court — Randallstown, MD · overall 5/5
- Future Care Pineview — Clinton, MD · overall 3/5
- Future Care Sandtown-Winchester — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
- Good Samaritan Nursing Home Operator, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
- Levindale Hebrew Ger Ctr & HSP — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5
- Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 5/5
- Atlee Hill Health and Rehab Center — Westminster, MD · overall 2/5
- Courtland, LLC — Baltimore, MD · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 17 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you arrange eye and hearing care for residents, including appointments and equipment like glasses or hearing aids?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Maryland midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 83 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Heritage LLC | 1.0 mi | Dundalk, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Future Care Canton Harbor | 1.8 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care Center | 3.3 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Transitional Care Services at Mercy Medical Center | 4.1 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Riverview | 4.5 mi | Essex, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Future Care Cold Spring | 4.6 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Overlea | 4.7 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Nursing and Rehab Center at Stadium Place | 4.8 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Roland Park Place | 4.8 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Future Care Charles Village | 4.9 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Future Care Homewood | 5.0 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Rossville Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 5.2 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Baltimore, MD — 43 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Future Care Old Court — Randallstown, MD · overall 5/5
- Glen Meadows Retirement Com. — Glen Arm, MD · overall 4/5
- Holly Hill Healthcare Center — Towson, MD · overall 2/5abuse
- King David Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Baltimore, MD · overall 2/5abuse
- Little Sisters of the Poor — Baltimore, MD · overall 4/5
- Lorien Mays Chapel — Timonium, MD · overall 4/5
- Maryland Masonic Homes LTD — Cockeysville, MD · overall 3/5
- Meadow Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Catonsville, MD · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215147.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).