Future Care Canton Harbor

Name: Future Care Canton Harbor
Address: 1300 SOUTH ELLWOOD AVENUE, Baltimore, MD, 21224, US
Telephone: 4103426644

1300 South Ellwood Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224 · Baltimore City County · 160 certified beds · avg 153 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1988

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$13,627

Fines, last 3 years

3.51

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 12, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Feb 20, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (53)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Sep 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 1, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Apr 12, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Sep 19, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 1, 2019	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 1, 2019	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 1, 2019	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 1, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 1, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 1, 2019	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 1, 2019	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 1, 2019	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 2).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2019	33	0	F
2023	11	0	E
2024	4	1	J ▲
2025	5	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,627.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Apr 12, 2024	Fine	$13,627

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Maryland avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.51	3.83	3.95	bottom 49% in Maryland; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.79	0.83	0.69	top 36% in Maryland; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.23	3.43	3.50	top 48% in Maryland; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.73	0.63	0.48	top 24% in Maryland; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	38.0	40.2	45.8	top 43% in Maryland; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	18.5	38.7	42.9	top 9% in Maryland; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.83, weekend 3.38. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Powers, Jeffrey	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Powers, Mark	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	12%	12/01/2025
Powers, Mark	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
The Leonard J Attman 1995 Trust	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	04/14/2014
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Jeffrey Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Alvin Powers Residuary Trust Fbo Mark Powers	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2025
Attman, Gary	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/14/2025
Attman, Gary	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2005
Attman, Jeffrey	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/26/2025
Attman, Leonard	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2005
Attman, Leonard	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2005
Canton Harbor RP, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/14/2014
Evans, Ryan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/22/2019
Evans, Ryan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/22/2019
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2005
Finglass, Brian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2005
Finglass, Brian	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2005
Future Care Health and Management Corporation	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/26/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Future Care Northpoint	1.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	4/5
Transitional Care Services at Mercy Medical Center	2.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Complete Care at Heritage LLC	2.9 mi	Dundalk, MD	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Roland Park Place	3.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★★	5/5
Future Care Charles Village	3.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Fayette Health and Rehabilitation Center	3.6 mi	Baltimore, MD	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Future Care Homewood	3.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	4/5
The Nursing and Rehab Center at Stadium Place	3.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare Post-Acute Care Center	3.8 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	2/5
Future Care Sandtown-Winchester	4.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★★☆	3/5
Future Care Cold Spring	4.5 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Maryland Baptist Aged Home	5.0 mi	Baltimore, MD	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baltimore →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215176.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Future Care Canton Harbor

1300 South Ellwood Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224 · 4103426644

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $13,627

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Apr 12, 2024 (F-0600, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 215176 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)