MarylandBaltimore

Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC

4800 Seton Drive, Baltimore, MD 21215 · Baltimore City County · 200 certified beds · avg 192 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1989

Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jan 8, 2026B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jul 19, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jun 4, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 4, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 4, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways.
Jun 4, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019140E
202440E
202550D
202670D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.663.833.95top 42% in Maryland; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.830.69bottom 7% in Maryland; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.213.433.50top 49% in Maryland; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.630.48bottom 6% in Maryland; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.140.245.8top 43% in Maryland; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)34.838.742.9top 41% in Maryland; top 38% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.44, weekend 3.43. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Attman, GaryIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Jeffrey Mark Attman 2005 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest18%06/01/2005
Lifebridge Investments, INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%05/01/2016
LSJW Lochearn LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Michelle Way LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest30%06/01/2005
Practice Dynamics, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10%05/01/2016
Attman, GaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Attman, GaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Attman, LeonardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Attman, LeonardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Finglass, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Finglass, BrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Finglass, BrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Future Care Health and Management CorporationOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005
Miller, TamaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Miller, TamaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Spadaro, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/05/2013
Spadaro, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2005

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Resorts of Augsburg0.9 miBaltimore, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arlington West1.4 miBaltimore, MD★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bridgepark1.6 miBaltimore, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
King David Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.6 miBaltimore, MD★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Pikesville2.3 miPikesville, MD★★☆☆☆1/5
Northwest Healthcare Center2.4 miBaltimore, MD★★★★☆4/5
Blue Point Healthcare Center2.4 miBaltimore, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Levindale Hebrew Ger Ctr & HSP2.5 miBaltimore, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Courtland, LLC2.6 miBaltimore, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor3.2 miBaltimore, MD★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baltimore →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215207.