Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC
4800 Seton Drive, Baltimore, MD 21215 · Baltimore City County · 200 certified beds · avg 192 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1989
Part of chain: FUTURE CARE/LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (30)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Oct 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint |
| Oct 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Oct 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Oct 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint |
| Jul 19, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jul 19, 2024 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.66 | 3.83 | 3.95 | top 42% in Maryland; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.83 | 0.69 | bottom 7% in Maryland; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.21 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 49% in Maryland; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.63 | 0.48 | bottom 6% in Maryland; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.1 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 43% in Maryland; top 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 34.8 | 38.7 | 42.9 | top 41% in Maryland; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.44, weekend 3.43. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Jeffrey Mark Attman 2005 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 18% | 06/01/2005 |
| Lifebridge Investments, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 05/01/2016 |
| LSJW Lochearn LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Michelle Way LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 30% | 06/01/2005 |
| Practice Dynamics, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 05/01/2016 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Attman, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Attman, Leonard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Finglass, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Future Care Health and Management Corporation | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
| Miller, Tamara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Miller, Tamara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Spadaro, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2013 |
| Spadaro, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2005 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
- "Can I see the actual room my family member would live in before we decide?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resorts of Augsburg | 0.9 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arlington West | 1.4 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Bridgepark | 1.6 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| King David Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Pikesville | 2.3 mi | Pikesville, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Northwest Healthcare Center | 2.4 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Blue Point Healthcare Center | 2.4 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Levindale Hebrew Ger Ctr & HSP | 2.5 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Courtland, LLC | 2.6 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Alice Manor | 3.2 mi | Baltimore, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215207.