21 Fairlane Road, Reading, PA 19606 (opens Google Maps) · Berks County · (610) 779-8522· 124 certified beds · avg 118 residents/day · certified since Oct 3, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: LME FAMILY HOLDINGS (15 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Mar 24, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint F-0725
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| May 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Mar 24, 2026 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Dec 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Apr 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · F-0810 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 4 | 1 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $101,602.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026 | Fine | $101,602 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.47 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 40% in Pennsylvania; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 36% in Pennsylvania; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.14 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 39% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 49% in Pennsylvania; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 44% in Pennsylvania; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 31% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.08, RN 0.49, weekend 2.79.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fairlane Gardens Nursing and Rehab at Reading. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samara Holdings Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 32% | 01/28/2020 |
| Sebbag, Gabriel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 05/14/2018 |
| Strawberry Hill Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 32% | 01/28/2020 |
| Underscore Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/14/2018 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| GPH Mount Penn LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/14/2018 |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Robinson, Jacquelyn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Robinson, Jacquelyn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2025 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2025 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Lme Family Holdings — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Berkshire LLC | 0.5 mi | Reading, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wyomissing Health and Rehabilitation Center | 5.1 mi | Reading, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Spruce Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | West Reading, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| West Reading Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce | 5.5 mi | West Reading, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mifflin Center | 5.7 mi | Shillington, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Highlands at Wyomissing | 6.5 mi | Wyomissing, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Laureldale Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent | 6.6 mi | Laureldale, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Transitional Sub-Acute Unit | 7.8 mi | Wyomissing, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sinking Spring Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 8.3 mi | Sinking Spring, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Zerbe Sisters Nursing Center, | 10.7 mi | Narvon, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Berks Heim Nursing & Rehabilitation | 11.4 mi | Leesport, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Pottstown | 11.6 mi | Pottstown, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Berks, PA — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395627.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details