MinnesotaHastings

Augustana Care Hastings Health and Rehabilitation

930 West 16th Street, Hastings, MN 55033 · Dakota County · 72 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Nov 6, 1978

Part of chain: CASSIA (16 facilities, chain avg rating 4.4★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$21,645
Fines, last 3 years
5.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 19, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 19, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 23, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Apr 11, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 11, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202490E
202580F
202611J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $21,645.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 19, 2026Fine$21,645

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMinnesota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.234.833.95top 27% in Minnesota; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.321.220.69top 32% in Minnesota; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.574.273.50top 31% in Minnesota; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.660.690.48top 42% in Minnesota; top 18% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.342.245.8top 30% in Minnesota; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)12.538.642.9top 8% in Minnesota; top 6% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.60, RN 1.16, weekend 4.02. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Augustana CareOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2018
CassiaOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Dahl, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Ellingson, ErikIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Kern, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Nye, GeraldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Parks, CharlesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Ramsdale, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Stadtherr, SeelochaniIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Szymanski, KimIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Verlautz, MicheleneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Youngquist, KathrynIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Regina Senior Living1.4 miHastings, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Prescott Nursing and Rehab Community4.4 miPrescott, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Norris Square8.5 miCottage Grove, MN★★★★★4/5
St Therese of Woodbury LLC11.9 miWoodbury, MN★★★★☆3/5
Woodbury Health Care Center13.2 miWoodbury, MN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Woodlyn Heights Healthcare Center13.7 miInver Grove Heights, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Trinity Care Center14.5 miFarmington, MN★★★★★3/5
Southview Acres Healthcare Center14.8 miWest Saint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Good Samaritan Society - Inver Grove Heights14.8 miInver Grove Heights, MN★★★☆☆3/5
Kinnic Health and Rehabilitation Center15.6 miRiver Falls, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Walker Methodist Westwood Ridge II16.1 miWest Saint Paul, MN★★☆☆☆2/5
Apple Valley Village Health Care Center17.1 miApple Valley, MN★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Hastings →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 245224.