How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
307 Plaza Drive, Dover, NH 03820 (opens Google Maps) · Strafford County · (603) 742-2676· 112 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Jun 9, 1970 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES (42 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 10, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Hampshire avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.15 | 4.11 | 3.95 | bottom 19% in New Hampshire; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.69 | top 40% in New Hampshire; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.84 | 3.67 | 3.50 | bottom 25% in New Hampshire; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.48 | top 38% in New Hampshire; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.9 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 46% in New Hampshire; top 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.9 | 40.9 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in New Hampshire; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.87, weekend 2.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Dover Center for Health & Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bokow, Barry | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Geffner, Ira | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Gluck, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Lobell, Jonah | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Lowinger, Ben | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Lowinger, Joseph | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Marvin Ostreicher Family Trust 2012 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Meridian Capital Foundation | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Mso Associates LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, David | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ostreicher, Susan | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Schoor, Kalman | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Steg, Yitzchok | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Susan Ostreicher Family Trust 2012 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Ventas NHV Fund | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| VK Health Facilities LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Weinstock, Abraham | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
| Almeida, Elizabeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/28/2013 |
Showing 20 of 46 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 26 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain National Health Care Associates — 42 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 41 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Rest Home | 2.5 mi | Dover, NH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Langdon Place of Dover | 2.7 mi | Dover, NH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Saint Ann Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 4.9 mi | Dover, NH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Birch Healthcare Center | 6.4 mi | Rochester, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rochester Manor | 6.7 mi | Rochester, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pinnacle Health & Rehab at N Berwick | 9.8 mi | North Berwick, ME | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Durgin Pines | 10.8 mi | Kittery, ME | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edgewood Centre (the) | 12.2 mi | Portsmouth, NH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cedar Healthcare Center | 12.5 mi | Portsmouth, NH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Webster at Rye | 15.3 mi | Rye, NH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pinnacle Health & Rehab at Sanford | 15.9 mi | Sanford, ME | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rockingham County Nursing Home | 16.2 mi | Brentwood, NH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305018.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details