1925 Reeves Road, Plainfield, IN 46168 (opens Google Maps) · Hendricks County · (317) 838-7070· 104 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since May 29, 2015 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARDON & ASSOCIATES (19 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 23, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 23, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2024 · F-0550
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| May 23, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $33,579.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | Fine | $33,579 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.17 | 3.42 | 3.95 | top 11% in Indiana; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 43% in Indiana; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.63 | 3.01 | 3.50 | top 13% in Indiana; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 40% in Indiana; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.4 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 43% in Indiana; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 40.4 | 42.9 | bottom 21% in Indiana; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.85, RN 0.55, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cumberland Trace Health & Living Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverview Hospital | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/01/2017 |
| Ankura Consulting Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/15/2022 |
| Balla, Matthew | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2022 |
| Balla, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2022 |
| Balla, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2022 |
| Barnett, William | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2020 |
| Barnett, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2020 |
| Barnett, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/15/2020 |
| Brackman, Kathryn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Brackman, Kathryn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Bradley & Associates INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Cardon and Associates INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2013 |
| Cardon and Associates INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2025 |
| Cardon Management Company LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2011 |
| Cardon Management Company LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2025 |
| Cattell, Zachary | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2022 |
| Cattell, Zachary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2022 |
| Cattell, Zachary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2022 |
| Cole Marketing Communications INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2015 |
| Emerson, Mark | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/15/2018 |
Showing 20 of 73 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 53 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Cardon & Associates — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plainfield Health Care Center | 1.9 mi | Plainfield, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Meadow Lakes | 4.2 mi | Mooresville, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Miller's Merry Manor | 4.8 mi | Mooresville, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Countryside Meadows | 4.8 mi | Avon, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Springs of Mooresville, the | 5.2 mi | Mooresville, IN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Washington Healthcare Center | 5.5 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Avon | 5.8 mi | Avon, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avon Health & Rehabilitation Center | 6.7 mi | Avon, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Chalet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.8 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooke Knoll Village | 7.0 mi | Avon, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Wellbrooke of Avon | 7.1 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westside Retirement Village | 7.6 mi | Indianapolis, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hendricks, IN — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155836.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details