OhioCincinnati

Cottingham Retirement Community

3995 Cottingham Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45241 · Hamilton County · 60 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Feb 22, 1985

Part of chain: LIONSTONE CARE (24 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 19, 2022 · F-0580

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 7, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Dec 29, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 19, 2022▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Aug 19, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Aug 19, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 2, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 2, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 2, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930F
202231J ▲
202420D
202520F
202690F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.703.453.95bottom 9% in Ohio; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.550.600.69top 49% in Ohio; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.453.073.50bottom 10% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.420.48bottom 46% in Ohio; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.748.745.8top 48% in Ohio; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.743.942.9top 10% in Ohio; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.99, RN 0.61, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Kazarnovsky, SolomonIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%06/01/2020
Stein, AbbaIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%06/01/2020
Cusner, AdamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Cusner, AdamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Cusner, AdamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Degyansky, JeffreyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Degyansky, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Degyansky, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Goldish, EliezerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2023
Goldish, EliezerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2023
Goldish, EliezerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2023
Kazarnovsky, SolomonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Kazarnovsky, SolomonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Stein, AbbaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Stein, AbbaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brookwood Care Center1.2 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Advanced Health Care of Cincinnati3.0 miCincinnati, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Meadowbrook Care Center3.8 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Chesterwood Atc4.2 miWest Chester, OH★★★★★4/5
Glendale Place Care Center4.4 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Majestic Care of Cedar Village.4.4 miMason, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Blue Ash Health & Rehab4.6 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
MCV Health Care Facilities, INC4.7 miMason, OH★★★★★5/5
Twin Lakes4.7 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★5/5
Maple Knoll Village4.8 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cincinnati →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365652.