How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
4900 Cooper Road, Cincinnati, OH 45242 (opens Google Maps) · Hamilton County · (513) 793-3362· 64 certified beds · avg 38 residents/day · certified since Jun 4, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BAO OPCO HOLDINGS (3 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 26, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 31 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint F-0908
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Mar 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint · F-0908 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents information about how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits. · from a complaint · F-0579 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Apr 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Jan 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Jan 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint · F-0727 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint · F-0582 |
| Nov 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Aug 26, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Aug 26, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Aug 26, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 26, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 26, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Aug 26, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 18 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.37 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 46% in Ohio; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in Ohio; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 49% in Ohio; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 27% in Ohio; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 70.4 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 6% in Ohio; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 18% in Ohio; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.47, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Blue Ash Health & Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bao Opco Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/30/2025 |
| Smithey, Ashley | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 25% | 06/30/2025 |
| Womack, Bryon | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 75% | 06/30/2025 |
| Bao Opco Holdings LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Berner, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Berner, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Denny, Amber | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Denny, Amber | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Kothari, Zahid | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Kothari, Zahid | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Murphy, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Murphy, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Ohio-Two Properties LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Ohio-Two Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Rise SNF Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Rise SNF Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/05/2025 |
| Smithey, Ashley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Smithey, Ashley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Womack, Bryon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
| Womack, Bryon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2025 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Bao Opco Holdings — 3 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery Care Center | 1.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Twin Lakes | 1.3 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Courtyard at Seasons | 1.4 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Kenwood Terrace Healthcare Center | 1.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Chamberlin Healthcare Center | 2.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Parkview Northwest Healthcare Center | 2.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Care Center | 2.6 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Astoria Place of Silverton | 3.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Madeira Healthcare Center | 3.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mount Notre Dame Health Center | 3.0 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Madeira | 3.9 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookwood Care Center | 4.2 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hamilton, OH — 69 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365218.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details