St Camillus Health Center
10101 W Wisconsin Ave, Wauwatosa, WI 53226 · Milwaukee County · 50 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1985
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: May 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 1, 2024 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (17)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Apr 14, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Apr 14, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 14, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · from a complaint |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Apr 14, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 9 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 6 | 1 | K ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $65,881.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2025 | Fine | $45,591 |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Fine | $20,290 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Wisconsin avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.26 | 4.29 | 3.95 | top 44% in Wisconsin; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.26 | 1.01 | 0.69 | top 22% in Wisconsin; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.86 | 3.84 | 3.50 | top 42% in Wisconsin; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.10 | 0.68 | 0.48 | top 8% in Wisconsin; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.5 | 46.9 | 45.8 | top 36% in Wisconsin; top 40% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 39.7 | 42.9 | bottom 48% in Wisconsin; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.60, RN 1.36, weekend 4.17. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angell, Shannon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Barnes, Stacy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Blanco, Leandro | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2013 |
| Crivello, Mario | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1997 |
| Curran, Melissa | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Donovan, Amber | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Kiser, Alicia | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Laubusch, Nick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2006 |
| Maslowski, Jim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Orosa, Agustin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Perumpil, Mathai | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Taylor, Judith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Vellachira, Johnson | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Watson, Steve | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Winzenburg, George | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolve at West Allis Respiratory and Rehab | 1.7 mi | West Allis, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lutheran Home | 2.3 mi | Wauwatosa, WI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| St. Anne's Salvatorian Campus | 3.3 mi | Milwaukee, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Congregational Home, INC. | 3.4 mi | Brookfield, WI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maplewood Center | 3.5 mi | West Allis, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aria at Mitchell Manor | 3.9 mi | West Allis, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lindengrove New Berlin | 4.0 mi | New Berlin, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Milwaukee Health and Rehab | 4.3 mi | Milwaukee, WI | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Luther Manor | 4.4 mi | Milwaukee, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Clement Manor Health Care Center | 4.5 mi | Greenfield, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mercy Health Services | 4.9 mi | Milwaukee, WI | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aria of Brookfield | 5.1 mi | Brookfield, WI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525382.