WisconsinNew Berlin

Lindengrove New Berlin

13755 W Fieldpointe Dr, New Berlin, WI 53151 · Waukesha County · 110 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$100,006
Fines, last 3 years
3.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 8, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 26, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 21, 2025 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 10, 2022 · F-0760

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 6, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 8, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 26, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 21, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jan 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 10, 2022▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Aug 10, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 10, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Aug 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Aug 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 10, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202291G ▲
202360F
202440D
2025133G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $100,006, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 8, 2025Fine$55,200
Jan 21, 2025Fine$44,806
Jan 21, 2025Payment Denial12 days from Feb 21, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.674.293.95bottom 33% in Wisconsin; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.691.010.69bottom 22% in Wisconsin; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.293.843.50bottom 33% in Wisconsin; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.680.48bottom 24% in Wisconsin; top 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.646.945.8bottom 48% in Wisconsin; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)26.739.742.9top 30% in Wisconsin; top 24% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.65, RN 0.69, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Marks, JulieIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Marquardt Village INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%03/07/2023
Dettman, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2023
Fischer, ToddIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2023
Heroux, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2024
Illuminus INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2023
Illuminus INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/07/2025
Jones, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/23/2024
Jones, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/28/2025
Kohlhoff, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Konkol, DennisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Marks, JulieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Marks, JulieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Marks, JulieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Marks, JulieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Mauthe, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2023
Mauthe, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2023
Mauthe, MatthewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2023
Meidenbauer, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2023
Van Der Linden, KatieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Clement Manor Health Care Center3.1 miGreenfield, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Maplewood Center3.2 miWest Allis, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Resolve at West Allis Respiratory and Rehab3.5 miWest Allis, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Hales Corners4.0 miHales Corners, WI★★★☆☆3/5
St Camillus Health Center4.0 miWauwatosa, WI★★☆☆☆1/5
Aria of Brookfield4.3 miBrookfield, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Aria at Mitchell Manor5.4 miWest Allis, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Congregational Home, INC.5.9 miBrookfield, WI★★★★☆3/5
Sunrise Health Services5.9 miMilwaukee, WI★★☆☆☆2/5
Greendale Park Nursing and Rehab5.9 miGreendale, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Care Age6.1 miBrookfield, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Franciscan Woods6.1 miBrookfield, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New Berlin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525064.