Missouri ›Joplin

Communities of Wildwood Ranch

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

3222 South John Duffy Drive, Joplin, MO 64804 (opens Google Maps) · Jasper County · (417) 621-0175· 120 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Apr 4, 2014 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 13, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jan 10, 2024
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.21
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 10, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. F-0757

  2. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Jan 10, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jul 28, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607
Jul 28, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Jul 28, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Jan 24, 2020E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638
Jan 24, 2020E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640
Jan 24, 2020E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Jan 24, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Jan 24, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jan 24, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202060E
202340E
202411G ▲
202510D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.21
Missouri average: 3.66
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.46
Missouri average: 0.49
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.85
Missouri average: 3.22
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.213.663.95top 25% in Missouri; top 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.490.69top 42% in Missouri; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.853.223.50top 22% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.330.48top 39% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)42.156.045.8top 16% in Missouri; top 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)18.247.842.9top 11% in Missouri; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.81, RN 0.52, weekend 4.39.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.81 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Communities of Wildwood Ranch. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Circle B Enterprises Holding Company INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1996
Agh1 LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2016
Agh1 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Beaird, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Beaird, ToddIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Bedell, BryanIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/12/2025
Bedell, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Bedell, DonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Bedell, DonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1996
Cascone, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Cascone, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
DCB Real Estate Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
FG LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2016
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2021
Joplin Development Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Mid States INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/03/2014
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2021
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2025
Thomas, CynthiaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2023
Thomas, CynthiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2023

Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Circle B Enterprises — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
  • "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
  • "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
  • "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
  • "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
  • "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
  • "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 15 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Westgate0.0 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Galena Nursing & Rehab Center2.3 miGalena, KS★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Aspire Senior Living Joplin2.6 miJoplin, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Joplin Gardens3.6 miJoplin, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare, Joplin5.7 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Quaker Hill Manor6.2 miBaxter Springs, KS★★★★☆4/5
Aspire Senior Living Webb City9.2 miWebb City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Higher Call Nursing Center13.2 miQuapaw, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
Seneca Nursing15.1 miSeneca, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Medicalodges Columbus16.7 miColumbus, KS★★★☆☆2/5
St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation17.3 miCarthage, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Aspire Senior Living Carthage17.6 miCarthage, MO★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Jasper, MO — 7 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Joplin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265848.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details