MissouriSaint Louis

Delhaven Manor

5460 Delmar Blvd, Saint Louis, MO 63112 · St. Louis City County · 156 certified beds · avg 29 residents/day · certified since Aug 30, 1989

Part of chain: CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$73,048
Fines, last 3 years
7.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 10, 2024 · F-0740 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (48)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Nov 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 13, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss.
Aug 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint
Jul 10, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Apr 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Apr 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Aug 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Jun 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jun 30, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly protect the personal money residents deposited with it for safekeeping.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Oct 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 11, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 11, 2019B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 11, 2019B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019160E
2023100E
2024211J ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $73,048, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 17, 2024Fine$73,048
Jun 17, 2024Payment Denial5 days from Aug 16, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)7.543.663.95top 1% in Missouri; top 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.490.69bottom 39% in Missouri; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing6.203.223.50top 1% in Missouri; top 2% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.330.48top 26% in Missouri; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.056.045.8
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.18, RN 0.35, weekend 5.91. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Circle B Enterprises Holding Company INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/07/2002
Agh1 LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2016
Agh1 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Beaird, ToddIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Beaird, ToddIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Bedell, BryanIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/02/2025
Bedell, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2002
Bedell, DonaldIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2002
Bedell, DonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2002
Circle B Enterprises Holding Company INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2002
FG LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/02/2016
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2021
Jackson, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2024
Jackson, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2024
Labonte, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Labonte, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Mid States INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2010
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2021
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2025
Van de Ven LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Monarch Springs Wellness & Rehabilitation1.5 miUniversity City, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Bernard Care Center1.7 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Oak Park Care Center1.9 miSaint Louis, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Grand Manor Health Care Center2.6 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
U-City Forest Manor2.6 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Normandy Nursing Center2.8 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Life Care Center of St Louis3.0 miSaint Louis, MO★★★★☆3/5
Blue Circle Rehab and Nursing3.3 miSaint Louis, MO★★☆☆☆1/5
Barnes-Jewish Extended Care3.7 miSaint Louis, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Beauvais Rehab and Healthcare Center3.7 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Lutheran Convalescent Home4.6 miWebster Groves, MO★★★★★4/5
Lansdowne Village4.6 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Louis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265392.