Aspire Senior Living Joplin

2218 W 32nd Street, Joplin, MO 64804 (opens Google Maps) · Newton County · (417) 623-5264· 120 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Dec 24, 1986 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 20, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Jun 1, 2026

Fines, last 3 years

3.20

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 1, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 16, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 55 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Jun 1, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
Jun 1, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
Jun 1, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550

View all 55 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 1, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Jun 1, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Jun 1, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550
Jun 1, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554
Jun 1, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678
Jun 1, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Jun 1, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760
Feb 19, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint · F-0728
Feb 19, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Dec 18, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint · F-0728
Dec 18, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
Dec 18, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Dec 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755
May 20, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · F-0728
May 20, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 20, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725
May 20, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · F-0627
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
May 20, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791
Jan 9, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602
Nov 21, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602
Oct 3, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602
Oct 3, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Sep 11, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801
Sep 11, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Sep 11, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Sep 11, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building. · F-0922
Sep 11, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561
Sep 11, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Sep 11, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625
Sep 11, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Feb 6, 2020	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Feb 6, 2020	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Feb 6, 2020	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Feb 6, 2020	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 6, 2020	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 20).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2020

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2020	5	0	D
2023	13	0	F
2024	3	0	D
2025	25	0	F
2026	9	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMissouri averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.20

3.66

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.42

0.49

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.81

3.22

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Missouri avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.20	3.66	3.95	bottom 32% in Missouri; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.42	0.49	0.69	top 49% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.81	3.22	3.50	bottom 33% in Missouri; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.31	0.33	0.48	top 41% in Missouri; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	—	56.0	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	—	47.8	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.34, RN 0.44, weekend 2.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.34 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Aspire Senior Living Joplin. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company · changed ownership in the last 12 months

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Brody, Michael	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Brown, Barbara	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Brown, Daniel	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
CHP SNF Holdings LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
CHP SNF Opco Holdings LLC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
CHP Snfco LLC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Eickhoff, Pamela	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Leipham, Michelle	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Shevlyagin, Victor	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Stadtmueller, David	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Brown, Daniel	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Brown, Daniel	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Eickhoff, Pamela	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Eickhoff, Pamela	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Hero Health Management, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Hero Health Management, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Leipham, Michelle	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Leipham, Michelle	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Moss, Christopher	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Moss, Christopher	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025

Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Aspire Senior Living — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Aspire Senior Living Malden — Malden, MO · overall 3/5
Aspire Senior Living Moberly — Moberly, MO · overall 1/5
Aspire Senior Living New Florence — New Florence, MO · overall 1/5
Aspire Senior Living Oak Grove — Oak Grove, MO · overall 2/5
Aspire Senior Living Platte City — Platte City, MO · overall 1/5
Aspire Senior Living Pleasant Hill — Pleasant Hill, MO · overall 1/5
Aspire Senior Living Poplar Bluff — Poplar Bluff, MO · overall 2/5
Aspire Senior Living Roaring River — Cassville, MO · overall 3/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
"What training and competency checks do your nurse aides go through, and how do you keep their skills current?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Missouri midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS records an ownership change here in the last 12 months — what changed for residents and staff?"
"The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 14 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Joplin Gardens	1.0 mi	Joplin, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Communities of Wildwood Ranch	2.6 mi	Joplin, MO	★★★★☆	5/5
Westgate	2.6 mi	Joplin, MO	★★☆☆☆	2/5
NHC Healthcare, Joplin	3.1 mi	Joplin, MO	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Galena Nursing & Rehab Center	4.9 mi	Galena, KS	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Aspire Senior Living Webb City	7.9 mi	Webb City, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Quaker Hill Manor	8.8 mi	Baxter Springs, KS	★★★★☆	4/5
St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation	15.1 mi	Carthage, MO	★★★☆☆	4/5
Seneca Nursing	15.2 mi	Seneca, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Higher Call Nursing Center	15.2 mi	Quapaw, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Aspire Senior Living Carthage	15.4 mi	Carthage, MO	★★★☆☆	3/5
Medicalodges Neosho	18.2 mi	Neosho, MO	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Newton, MO — 5 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Granby House — Granby, MO · overall 2/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Joplin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265309.