MissouriSarcoxie

Sarcoxie Health Care Center

1505 Miner, Sarcoxie, MO 64862 · Jasper County · 40 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1996

Part of chain: RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT (34 facilities, chain avg rating 1.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
1.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 28, 2025 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 28, 2025 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 14, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 27, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 28, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Mar 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Mar 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Aug 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202060E
202370F
202410E
2025102G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)1.193.663.95bottom 1% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.490.69bottom 41% in Missouri; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing0.883.223.50bottom 1% in Missouri; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.330.48top 21% in Missouri; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)84.056.045.8bottom 2% in Missouri; bottom 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 1.49, RN 0.47, weekend 1.11. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Destefane, RichardIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
RCG INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Reliant Care Group LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Richard J. Destefane Revocable Living TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Arshad, AbdullahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Arshad, AbdullahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Destefane, RichardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Destefane, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Greathouse, JohnnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Greathouse, JohnnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Reliant Care Management Company LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Reliant Care Management Company LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2025
Richard J. Destefane Revocable Living TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
Sarcoxie Associates LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025
TLG II LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/25/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Aspire Senior Living Carthage10.9 miCarthage, MO★★★☆☆3/5
St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation11.0 miCarthage, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Granby House12.7 miGranby, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Lacoba Homes INC14.6 miMonett, MO★★★★★5/5
Lawrence County Manor16.6 miMount Vernon, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mt Vernon Nursing16.8 miMount Vernon, MO★★★★☆4/5
Aspire Senior Living Webb City19.7 miWebb City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare, Joplin19.8 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Sarcoxie →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265649.