MissouriCarthage

Aspire Senior Living Carthage

1901 Buena Vista Avenue, Carthage, MO 64836 · Jasper County · 120 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Jul 7, 1987

Part of chain: ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING (16 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 31, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 31, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Mar 31, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Mar 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 26, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care.
Mar 13, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Mar 13, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 13, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202050E
202360F
202570F
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.273.663.95bottom 35% in Missouri; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.280.490.69bottom 24% in Missouri; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.813.223.50bottom 33% in Missouri; bottom 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.160.330.48bottom 15% in Missouri; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.056.045.8
RN turnover (%)0.047.842.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.64, RN 0.23, weekend 2.27. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation · changed ownership in the last 12 months

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brody, MichaelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Brown, BarbaraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Brown, DanielIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Brown, DanielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Brown, DanielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Brown, MicheleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Brown, MicheleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Eickhoff, PamelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Eickhoff, PamelaIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Eickhoff, PamelaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Hero Health Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Leipham, MichelleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Leipham, MichelleIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Leipham, MichelleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Stadtmueller, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Stadtmueller, DavidIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Stadtmueller, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Sweeten, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025
Sweeten, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation0.3 miCarthage, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Aspire Senior Living Webb City9.7 miWebb City, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sarcoxie Health Care Center10.9 miSarcoxie, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
NHC Healthcare, Joplin12.9 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Joplin Gardens14.4 miJoplin, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5
Aspire Senior Living Joplin15.4 miJoplin, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Granby House16.7 miGranby, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Communities of Wildwood Ranch17.6 miJoplin, MO★★★★☆5/5
Westgate17.6 miJoplin, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Galena Nursing & Rehab Center19.3 miGalena, KS★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Carthage →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265320.