Communities of Wildwood Ranch

Name: Communities of Wildwood Ranch
Address: 3222 SOUTH JOHN DUFFY DRIVE, Joplin, MO, 64804, US
Telephone: 4176210175

3222 South John Duffy Drive, Joplin, MO 64804 · Jasper County · 120 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Apr 4, 2014

Part of chain: CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES (36 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.21

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 10, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 10, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 28, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jul 28, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 24, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Jan 24, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 24, 2020	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jan 24, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 24, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 24, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2020	6	0	E
2023	4	0	E
2024	1	1	G ▲
2025	1	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Missouri avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.21	3.66	3.95	top 25% in Missouri; top 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.46	0.49	0.69	top 42% in Missouri; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.85	3.22	3.50	top 22% in Missouri; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.31	0.33	0.48	top 39% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	42.1	56.0	45.8	top 16% in Missouri; top 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	18.2	47.8	42.9	top 11% in Missouri; top 12% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.81, RN 0.52, weekend 4.39. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Circle B Enterprises Holding Company INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/01/1996
Agh1 LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/02/2016
Agh1 LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/25/2025
Beaird, Todd	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022
Beaird, Todd	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2022
Bedell, Bryan	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/12/2025
Bedell, Donald	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996
Bedell, Donald	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996
Bedell, Donald	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1996
Cascone, John	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2017
Cascone, John	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2017
DCB Real Estate Partnership LP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2010
FG LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/02/2016
Forvis Mazars LLP	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/16/2021
Joplin Development Properties LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2010
Mid States INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/03/2014
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/23/2021
Sovereign Healthcare Group LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/06/2025
Thomas, Cynthia	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2023
Thomas, Cynthia	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/06/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
"How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
"How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
"What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
"How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Westgate	0.0 mi	Joplin, MO	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Galena Nursing & Rehab Center	2.3 mi	Galena, KS	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Aspire Senior Living Joplin	2.6 mi	Joplin, MO	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Joplin Gardens	3.6 mi	Joplin, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
NHC Healthcare, Joplin	5.7 mi	Joplin, MO	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Quaker Hill Manor	6.2 mi	Baxter Springs, KS	★★★★☆	4/5
Aspire Senior Living Webb City	9.2 mi	Webb City, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Higher Call Nursing Center	13.2 mi	Quapaw, OK	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Seneca Nursing	15.1 mi	Seneca, MO	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Medicalodges Columbus	16.7 mi	Columbus, KS	★★★☆☆	2/5
St Luke's Nursing and Rehabilitation	17.3 mi	Carthage, MO	★★★☆☆	4/5
Aspire Senior Living Carthage	17.6 mi	Carthage, MO	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Joplin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265848.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Communities of Wildwood Ranch

3222 South John Duffy Drive, Joplin, MO 64804 · 4176210175

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Jan 10, 2024 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
☐ "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
☐ "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
☐ "How do you track that every resident's quarterly assessment happens on time?"
☐ "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
☐ "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
☐ "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 265848 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)