How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Cobble Hill Health Center INC
380 Henry Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 855-6789· 364 certified beds · avg 354 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 15, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 26, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 26, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 26, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint F-0657
View all 23 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| May 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Feb 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Dec 8, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 8, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Dec 8, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| May 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| May 14, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. · F-0568 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| May 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2021
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 3 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew York averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.29
New York average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.85
New York average: 0.68
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.00
New York average: 3.13
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.29 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in New York; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 18% in New York; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.00 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 49% in New York; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.68 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 17% in New York; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.8 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 39% in New York; top 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.4 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 40% in New York; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.40, RN 0.87, weekend 3.10.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.40 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cobble Hill Health Center INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobble Hill Lifecare, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/14/2012 |
| Brounstein, Genna | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Brounstein, Genna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Brounstein, Genna | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Carames, Charlie | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Carames, Charlie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Carames, Charlie | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Fox, Ira | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2022 |
| Fox, Ira | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2022 |
| Fox, Ira | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2022 |
| Godec, Ciril | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1980 |
| Godec, Ciril | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1980 |
| Godec, Ciril | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1980 |
| Heyer, John | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2022 |
| Heyer, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2022 |
| Heyer, John | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2022 |
| Jordan, Leonard | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Jordan, Leonard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Jordan, Leonard | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Kamuf, Rudy W | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
Showing 20 of 49 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 29 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 34% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 49 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 290 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 0.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.0 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Oxford Nursing Home | 1.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New Carlton Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC | 1.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| New Gouverneur Hospital SNF | 1.7 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New East Side Nursing Home | 2.0 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Downtown Brooklyn Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.2 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Concord Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.6 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Village Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.8 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Caton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, LLC | 3.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Monarch at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing | 3.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Crown Heights Center for Nursing and Rehabilitatio — Brooklyn, NY · overall 3/5
- Ditmas Park Care Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Dr Susan Smith McKinney Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Four Seasons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Hamilton Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Haym Solomon Home for the Aged — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335174.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).